Re: on the relation between DWBP Best Practices Document and the Linked Data Best Practices Working Group Note of GLD

Hi Antoine, I think the way that Bernadette incorporated my text is fine.
She removed the "extending" bit, so I guess we're all set now, also
considering your concern! regards,
João Paulo


On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> João Paulo's wording hints that we're extending only the GLD BPs, which
> seems a bit restrictive. But in general I think he's right. BPs should
> naturally be based on existing work. Now we're not very explicit at it,
> maybe because we're focused on our own use cases (which is good at this
> stage!)  and we have little time. But I believe in general future versions
> of the BP document will benefit a lot from more 'grounding' in existing
> work. At least that's my opinion for the BP I've most looked at (in the
> vocabulary section). And I trust that GLD will be a key resource, though
> not the only one.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
>
> On 1/22/15 5:53 PM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote:
>
>> Hi João Paulo,
>>
>> If we're gonna publish now, then I'd like to make one comment about
>> your proposal.
>>
>> I am not sure if we can say that "the practices extend the work
>> performed earlier in the Government Linked Data Working Group
>> [LD-BP]". I don't think that we extend a previous work. I suggest to
>> remove the first sentence.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Bernadette
>>
>> 2015-01-22 13:47 GMT-03:00 João Paulo Almeida <jpalmeida@ieee.org>:
>>
>>> Hi Bernadette,
>>>
>>> I sent this out already to the whole group, and there was no reaction. I
>>> would like this to be incorporated because our readers may be confused
>>> without this!
>>>
>>> I don¹t find it particularly polemic because it was mostly derived from
>>> our charter.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> João Paulo
>>>
>>> On 22/1/15, 2:07 PM, "Bernadette Farias Lóscio" <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hello João Paulo,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks! I liked your proposal, but I think we should discuss this with
>>>> the group. So, I suggest to include the paragraph in the next version
>>>> of the BP Document. Is it for you?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Bernadette
>>>>
>>>>  The practices recommended in this document build on and extend the work
>>>>> performed earlier in the Government Linked Data Working Group [LD-BP].
>>>>> It is intended to serve a more general purpose than the practices
>>>>> suggested in
>>>>> [LD-BP] since it is domain-independent and whilst it recommends the use
>>>>> of
>>>>> Linked Data, it also promotes best practices for data on the web in
>>>>> formats
>>>>> such as CSV and JSON. Best practices recommended in this document, in
>>>>> particular those related to the use of vocabularies incorporate
>>>>> practices
>>>>> that stem from [LD-BP] where appropriate. While [LD-BP] was published
>>>>> in its
>>>>> final version by the Government Linked Data Working Group as a Working
>>>>> Group
>>>>> Note, the charter of the Data on the Web Best Practices (DWBP) Working
>>>>> Group
>>>>> advances that this document should be published ultimately as a W3C
>>>>> Recommendation.
>>>>>
>>>>> [LD-BP]
>>>>> Bernadette Hyland; Ghislain Auguste Atemezing; Boris Villazón-Terrazas.
>>>>> Best
>>>>> Practices for Publishing Linked Data. 9 January 2014. W3C Note. URL:
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-bp/
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe it should go under ³Status of This Document².
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> João Paulo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>>>> Centro de Informática
>>>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> --------------
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>