Re: dwbp-ISSUE-133 (Standard metadata): SHOULD or MUST metadata be provided using standard terms [Best practices document(s)]

In the Intended Outcome is written MUST.

A question: is this BP addressed only to metadata for machines?

I think we will have this problem in general in the document because we
don't have separate BPs for humans and for machines. Should we qualify some
BPs?

Besides that, sometimes there will be new terms of a new ontology. So they
will not be standard terms yet. (makes sense?)

Laufer

2015-01-22 11:36 GMT-02:00 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group
Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>:

> dwbp-ISSUE-133 (Standard metadata): SHOULD or MUST metadata be provided
> using standard terms [Best practices document(s)]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/133
>
> Raised by: Phil Archer
> On product: Best practices document(s)
>
> Editing the doc today, 22 Jan, the ProvideMetadataStandardized BP says
> "Use standard terms to describe metadata" which I have changed to "Use
> standard terms to provide" metadata (i.e. provide, not describe metadata).
>
> But, is this is MUST or a SHOULD? (It's currently written as a SHOULD)
>
>
>
>


-- 
.  .  .  .. .  .
.        .   . ..
.     ..       .