- From: Carlos Iglesias <contact@carlosiglesias.es>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:32:54 +0100
- To: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAa1XzkMgfxp24GaLbfV0M0ybPkJwxS_-AjM3EX2YBfbc3j8Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Good point Makx, I think indeed that would be something great to have as further explanation about possible "extensibility" or "adaptation" mechanisms that I just briefly introduced in the last paragraph. On 22 January 2015 at 20:14, Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com> wrote: > > > > https://github.com/carlosiglesias/dwbp/commit/31db9f89731419c9567bfd7a > > 58e62acd478c6ed2 > > > > It's the latter than has the mention of DCAT-AP. I agree it probably > > needs citing somewhere, just not in *this* BP. > > > > OK, I see. > > I have been thinking about what the relevance of something like DCAT-AP > would be for Best Practices. > > It seems to me that the current BP document supposes an environment with > individual data publishers that are independent of other data publishers. > Publishers also don't know or don't need to know what data consumers will > want to do with their stuff. In such a set-up, recommending that they > provide as much metadata as possible and preferably using a standard like > DCAT makes sense. > > Now there are situations that data publishers do have relationships and do > know what a data consumer wants to do with it. In the case of the group of > organisations that agreed on the DCAT-AP ( > https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/dcat_application_profile/asset_release/dcat-application-profile-data-portals-europe-final), > they are part of a network of data portals that wanted to co-operate in > providing data to an aggregator who builds an index over the combined > collection. In such a case, it make sense to define, in addition to > agreeing on the base standard, DCAT, *how* to implement that standard for > that particular application. > > As the current BP collection does not consider these kinds of co-ordinated > interoperable networks, I agree that the reference is not relevant, but > maybe we should think of including something about these kinds of > environments? > > Makx. > > > -- --- Carlos Iglesias. Internet & Web Consultant. +34 687 917 759 contact@carlosiglesias.es @carlosiglesias http://es.linkedin.com/in/carlosiglesiasmoro/en
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 20:33:22 UTC