Re: Sequencial numbering of BPs

I agree that BPS are mainly identified by their titles, so why we have a
number? It may confuse things and we can't avoid people using the number as
id. And during the unstable phase we will have different references using
the same id. Well, maybe it is too much care.

2015-01-19 12:04 GMT-02:00 Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>:

> BP are mainly identified by their titles, for example "Provide Metadat
> BP", i.e.,  In the document, we don't make a reference to a BP using
> its number. In the case an extension, I suppose that the numbering of
> the current version will be stable and a new numbering may be used,
> no?
>
>
>
> 2015-01-19 10:58 GMT-03:00 Laufer <laufer@globo.com>:
> > But if a BP makes a reference to another one?
> >
> > And if we extend the document with another version?
> >
> > Laufer
> >
> > 2015-01-19 11:55 GMT-02:00 Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>:
> >>
> >> Hi Laufer,
> >>
> >>
> >> The number is generated automatically :) In this case, I think it
> >> won't be a problem to use numbers.
> >>
> >> thanks!
> >> Bernadette
> >>
> >> 2015-01-19 10:51 GMT-03:00 Laufer <laufer@globo.com>:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I am reviewing the issue of suppressing the BP4 (because we have an
> >> > entire
> >> > session about BP for data vocabularies) and if I agree in suppressing
> it
> >> > we
> >> > will have no renumber all the BPs.
> >> >
> >> > Is the sequential numbering an ideal way of identifying the BPs?
> >> >
> >> > Best,
> >> > Laufer
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > .  .  .  .. .  .
> >> > .        .   . ..
> >> > .     ..       .
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> >> Centro de Informática
> >> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
> >>
> >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > .  .  .  .. .  .
> > .        .   . ..
> > .     ..       .
>
>
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
.  .  .  .. .  .
.        .   . ..
.     ..       .

Received on Monday, 19 January 2015 14:30:27 UTC