- From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 19:55:49 +0100
- To: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <001201d03675$0a543a30$1efcae90$@makxdekkers.com>
One specific comment on Best Practice 20: Preserve person's right to privacy: I am not sure that it is correct to refer to a "person's right to privacy". I do agree that this is a fundamental human right but I don't think the best practice is about this right. Rather, the BP is about the requirement that publication of data respects the law that declares what you can legally publish about individual persons. In many countries, it is not legal to publish people's tax returns (although in some countries it is), but often this does not apply to people with a public role, like members of parliament or members of government, whose income and property tax returns must be publicly available in some countries to fight corruption. In some countries, even criminal records are public. Maybe the Best Practice could be called "Respect privacy laws" and the by-line something like "Data MUST protect personal information to the extent prescribed by law". By the way, in BP20, the text in "Why" would fit better under "Intended outcome" because it outlines the "how" and what is under "Intended outcome" would fit better under "Possible approach" as it recommends an approach to ensure compliance with the BP. Makx
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 18:56:21 UTC