W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > January 2015

RE: dwbp-ISSUE-92 (Dropping Formats): OK to drop last word of 'Requirements for Data Formats' from challenges/req list? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]

From: Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:00:38 +0000
To: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DA0D3B2CE5F5614AA2307A974AFAC39B01552E697C@UDSMBX02.uds.nuigalway.ie>
Propse to leave section title as 'Data Formats', as all reqs included only relate to formats. Location (now GeographicalContext) is now in Metadata section. Also, the title 'Data' is too vague

-----Original Message-----
From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] 
Sent: 10 November 2014 19:38
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Subject: dwbp-ISSUE-92 (Dropping Formats): OK to drop last word of 'Requirements for Data Formats' from challenges/req list? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]

dwbp-ISSUE-92 (Dropping Formats): OK to drop last word of 'Requirements for Data Formats' from challenges/req list? [Use Cases & Requirements Document]

http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/92


Raised by: Phil Archer
On product: Use Cases & Requirements Document

I'd like to drop the word 'Formats' from the challenge of 'Requirements for data Formats' since some issues And I think some future ones) are about data but not formats. R-Location being one.



Received on Sunday, 11 January 2015 03:01:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 11 January 2015 03:01:08 UTC