- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:50:48 -0800
- To: Eric <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Cc: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, Deirdre Lee <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
I agree that these are MUSTs. -Annette On Jan 17, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Eric <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote: > I raised this issue a couple days ago. Is there any way we can address this week? > > My concern is that the privacy and security communities won't be happy with SHOULD for addressing these requirements. I am advocating instead for using MUST. > > I know this goes back to the UCR doc. > > Am I misinterpreting SHOULD? > > > Thanks, > > Eric > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jan 15, 2015, at 9:59 AM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> >> dwbp-ISSUE-123 (Sensitive Data): Use of SHOULD versus MUST for Sensitive Data [Best practices document(s)] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/123 >> >> Raised by: Eric Stephan >> On product: Best practices document(s) >> >> My preference is to use MUST for http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/#R-SensitivePrivacy and http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/#R-SensitiveSecurity . What is the rationale for using SHOULD? >> >> >> >
Received on Sunday, 18 January 2015 19:51:13 UTC