W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > January 2015

RE: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87)

From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 19:29:01 +0100
To: "'Phil Archer'" <phila@w3.org>, "'Public DWBP WG'" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001101d03671$4c53d070$e4fb7150$@makxdekkers.com>

Not good that we have two issue trackers, especially as I don't know how to access the Github one.

What's that mention of DCAT-AP? I might think it is relevant, but for what and where?

Makx.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:25 PM
> To: Public DWBP WG
> Subject: Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation
> (#87)
> 
> Moving the conversation to the WG's mailing list (please don't use
> GitHub's issue tracker - it just confuses things).
> 
> -1 to this change.
> 
> The original text talked about multilingualism as well as
> specialisations of vocabularies (something that has been lost). The
> list
> of vocabs doesn't really tell people which one to use and when.
> BP#ProvideMetadata already points to DCAT and VoID. And I think if
> we're
> going to cite schema.org - which I'm happy to do - then we should tell
> people when to use that rather than DCAT (a question to which I'm
> really
> not sure of the answer).
> 
> And so on.
> 
> Overall, I think we should be more specific, giving the criteria ine
> should use to make a selection and then point to a possible solution.
> So, if you want DCAT but want to include versioning then use ADMS
> (which
> is a DCAT profile). If your aim is specifically to target your
> metadata
> at search engines then use schema.org and so on.
> 
> I don't think the DCAT-AP is relevant here.
> 
> Phil.
> 
> On 22/01/2015 16:25, Carlos Laufer wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > 2015-01-22 14:17 GMT-02:00 carlosiglesias <notifications@github.com>:
> >
> >> ------------------------------
> >> You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
> >>
> >>    https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87
> >> Commit Summary
> >>
> >>     - Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation
> >>
> >> File Changes
> >>
> >>     - *M* bp.html <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87/files#diff-0>
> (9)
> >>
> >> Patch Links:
> >>
> >>     - https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87.patch
> >>     - https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87.diff
> >>
> >> —
> >> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> >> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87>.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> 
> 
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
> 
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 18:29:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:31 UTC