W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > January 2015

RE: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72

From: Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:12:25 +0000
To: "Adriano C. Machado Pereira" <adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br>
CC: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Message-ID: <DA0D3B2CE5F5614AA2307A974AFAC39B01552E827D@UDSMBX02.uds.nuigalway.ie>
Hi Adriano,

Thanks for info. I've added DataEnrichment as a challenge, I agree this makes sense and we can consider breaking this into more fine-grain requirements for future versions of UCR and BP. I've also added the description of DataEnrichment that you recommend. http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html#R-DataEnrichment

Cheers,
Deirdre

Deirdre Lee, Research Associate, eGovernment Group
Insight Center for Data Analytics, NUI Galway, Ireland
Twitter: @deirdrelee, Skype: deirdrelee
Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/<http://ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/>
________________________________
From: adrianoc@gmail.com [adrianoc@gmail.com] on behalf of Adriano C. Machado Pereira [adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br]
Sent: 16 January 2015 15:26
To: Lee, Deirdre
Cc: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org; Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Subject: Re: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72

Hi Deirdre,

thanks for your message and to share your ideas.

The idea for data enrichment is that it is composed by different data tasks. The data enrichment process consists of applying one or more tasks in an independent way, where the data D are transformed in data D´ as a result of one data enrichment task. This can be a cyclic process, providing more data structure as the tasks are performed.

About the table (3.2 Requirements by Challenge), do you think the challenge can be named "Data Enrichment"??? Or do you think we have to assign it to an existent challenge?

I imagine the following:

R-Data-Enrichment:
It should be possible to perform some data enrichment tasks in order to aggregate value to data, therefore providing more value for user applications and services.

The idea is to later break it in small parts, according to the its tasks to apply in order to provide data enrichment. And I agree with you that it is better to add in a future version of the BP document.

What do you think about?

Thanks for your support!
Regards,
Adriano.
--
Adriano C. Machado Pereira.

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org<mailto:Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>> wrote:
Hi Adriano,

Thank you for your use-case Web Observatory [http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html#UC-WebObservatory] and the proposed new requirement(s) for Data Enrichment.

I’m afraid I missed the discussion around this requirement. Could you add a description for R-DataEnrichment and assign it to one of the Challenges in the table http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html#requirements-by-challenge?

I know you also suggest breaking the requirement down further into R-DataCharacterization; R-DataImputation; R-DataSegmentation; R-DataDisambiguation; R-DataEntityRecognition; R-DataFusion.
But perhaps this is something we could explore for the next Public Working Draft of the BP Document?

Cheers,
Deirdre



From: adrianoc@gmail.com<mailto:adrianoc@gmail.com> [mailto:adrianoc@gmail.com<mailto:adrianoc@gmail.com>] On Behalf Of Adriano C. Machado Pereira
Sent: 05 December 2014 14:50
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>; Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Subject: Re: dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment. related to issue-72

Hi all,

thanks for your help!

I have published the new use case for "Web Observatory", which demands requirements for Data Enrichment.

It is published in the Second Round Use Cases:
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases

Any comments or suggestions can be send to me.

ACTION-114 can be closed now.

Thanks! Regards,
Adriano C. M Pereira.

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Adriano C. Machado Pereira <adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br<mailto:adrianoc@dcc.ufmg.br>> wrote:
Thanks Bernadette and Yaso,

I will publish there.

Regards,
Adriano.
--
Adriano C. Machado Pereira.

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br<mailto:bfl@cin.ufpe.br>> wrote:
Great Adriano! Thanks!
You can publish the new case in the following page:
http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases
Cheers,
Bernadette

2014-12-05 9:54 GMT-03:00 Yaso <yaso@nic.br<mailto:yaso@nic.br>>:

On 12/5/14 9:53 AM, Adriano C. Machado Pereira wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> We have completed the new use case for "Web Observatory", which demands
> requirements for Data Enrichment.
>
\o/

> I am sending attached to this message the UC description.
>
> Do I have to publish this new UC in the wiki DWBP?

Do that, please, Adriano.

>
> I would like to ask about this in order to complete this ACTION-114.
>
> Thanks! Regards,
> Adriano C. M Pereira.
>

Thank you!
-yaso



> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working
> Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org<mailto:sysbot%2Btracker@w3.org>> wrote:
>
>> dwbp-ACTION-114: Complete use case and requirements for data enrichment.
>> related to issue-72
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/114
>>
>> Assigned to: Adriano Pereira
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

--
Brazilian Internet Steering Committee - CGI.br
W3C Brazil Office
@yaso

55 11 5509-3537<tel:55%2011%205509-3537> (4025)
skype: yasocordova



--
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 11:13:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:31 UTC