W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > January 2015

Re: COMURI and the BP document

From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:16:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CABP9CAHWtNauyWozh0UBVRhvez9g=YF17Jyk3K=zK2fyo=mB9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
CC: <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Bernadette,

Unique identifiers are indeed very important and they are many good ways
for minting them. I think it would be very hard to reach a concensus on one
strategy. Instead, let us just agree as a  BP that IRI must be used and
that they are several ways to implement them. We can then point to COMURI
and other similar documents.

By the way we could also indicate that different identifiers must be used
for different things. Eg not use the same URI for both the thing described
and the document describing it...

Christophe

--
Sent with difficulties. Sorry for the brievety and typos...
Op 9 jan. 2015 13:57 schreef "Bernadette Farias Lóscio" <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>:

> Hi all,
>
> We had a lot of discussion about the COMURI document [1], but still it is
> not clear if the COMURI is gonna be part of the BP document.
>
> I read the COMURI and I am not sure if defining a guide to have compact
> mnemonic URIs is in the scope of the BP document. The BP document should
> present BP for having unique identifiers for resources. However, I am not
> convinced that the BP document should also propose a schema for creating
> these identifiers.
>
> If the BP document will propose a schema for creating unique identifiers,
> then I suppose that the group should discuss if the COMURI is the best
> option for doing this.
>
> Unique identifiers is really an important topic of the BP document and it
> would be great to have your feedback about this question!
>
> Thank you!
> Bernadette
>
> [1] http://dragoman.org/comuri.html
>
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Received on Friday, 9 January 2015 13:17:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:31 UTC