Re: dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices document(s)]

Hi Bernadette,

I'd say that if a list of value becomes sufficiently important to deserve documentation, it is certainly worth considering it as a vocabulary.

This would solve your issue. Or at least reduce it to an editorial issue rather than adding a BP: the section on vocabulary should cover 'lists' well enough.

I have tried to add a reference to 'code list' there. It's probably not enough. That's part of the actions I've noted for myself at [1].
Please make suggestions!

Best,

Antoine

[1] http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Making_controlled_vocabularies_accessible_as_URI_sets

On 1/14/15 5:13 PM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> dwbp-ISSUE-120 (BernadetteLoscio): BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies [Best practices document(s)]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/120
>
> Raised by: Bernadette Farias Loscio
> On product: Best practices document(s)
>
> I think we should discuss the intersection among these BP.
>
> 1. For me it is not clear the difference between Document Metadata and Provide Metadata for humans as mentioned in the BP Provide metadata in different formats.
>
> 2. The BP Document Metadata mentions vocabularies and controlled lists. Since there is a specific BP to Document Vocabularies, then maybe we should have a specific BP to Document Controlled Lists.
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 00:10:49 UTC