Re: Updated version of UCR document online

Hi Deirdre,

Thanks for updating the UCR document!

I’ve left Data Selection Challenge in, because I’m not sure where to
> relocate ‘R-DataIrreproducibility, R-DataLifecyclePrivacy,
> R-DataLifecycleStage’ to (I suggest removing R-DesignatedUserExpertise as
> it is covered by R-UsageFeedback and R-TrackDataUsage). Will take guidance
> from BP structure on these reqs (maybe can leave for couple of weeks).
>

ok! I'm also not sure how to relocate these requirements :)


>
>
> Similar with separate reqs for bp vs. the vocabs. How about for now we
> leave it, and see how much BP doc addresses and how much is left to vocabs,
> and then review structure of UCR if necessary after?
>
>
>

ok!

Cheers,
Bernadette



>
>
>
>
> *From:* Bernadette Farias Lóscio [mailto:bfl@cin.ufpe.br]
> *Sent:* 11 January 2015 15:25
> *To:* Lee, Deirdre
> *Cc:* Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group
> *Subject:* Re: Updated version of UCR document online
>
>
>
> Hi Deirde,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the updates! I took a look in the current version of the UCR
> document and I found the following inconsistencies between the BP document
> and the UCR doc. I also propose some solutions to solve them.
>
>
>
> 1. In the BP document there are 03 challenges that are not listed in the
> UCR doc: Data Versioning, Data Preservation and Feedback.
>
>
> To solve this, I suggest to:
>    - create a new challenge called "Data Versioning" and associate the
> R-DataVersion requirement to this new challenge.
>    - rename the challenge "Requirements for Persistence" to "Requirements
> for Preservation".
>    - create a new challenge called "Feedback" and associate the
> R-UsageFeedback requirement to this new challenge.
>
> 2. Data Selection and Industry reuse were not considered in the BPD
>
>    - During the last F2F, Data Selection was considered to be out of the
> scope of the BP document. I suggest to remove the Challenge Data Selection
> and to relocate the following requirements: R-DataIrreproducibility,
> R-DataLifecyclePrivacy, R-DataLifecycleStage and R-DesignatedUserExpertise.
>
> - Since SLA is a type of metadata (similar to Geographic Context), I
> suggest to remove the challenge  "Industry Reuse" and include the
> requirement R-SLAAvailable in the Metadata section.
>
> 3. I understand that requirements from Section 4.2 and 4.3 are
> requirements for the vocabularies instead of vocabularies for BP. I think
> that this should be more clear in the UC document. I suggest to:
>
> - separate requirements for BP from requirements for Vocabularies in
> Section 3.2.
> - include a new requirement for Data Quality, like "Data Quality
> information should be available". This requirement can be easily covered by
> a BP.
>
> Please, let me know if you have other comments or suggestions.
>
> cheers,
> Bernadette
>
>
>
> 2015-01-11 0:26 GMT-03:00 Lee, Deirdre <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The latest version of the UCR document is now online:
> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/usecasesv1.html
>
>
>
> This includes all of the feedback from the use-case authors. As you can
> see, there are a lot more linkages now between use-cases and requirements.
> This helped reemphasise some existing requirements, identify those that are
> out of scope, merge a couple, and identify a couple of new requirements not
> yet included.
>
>
>
> I have also addressed the open issues.
>
>
>
> If you’re interested, I’ve also uploaded the UCR.ttl file
> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Use-Cases_Requirements_RDF
>
>
>
> Hopefully this will be useful for contributors to the BP document.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Deirdre
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Deirdre Lee
>
> Research Associate
>
> eGovernment Domain (DEG)
>
> Insight-NUIG
>
> IDA BusinessPark, Lower Dangan,
>
> Galway, Ireland
>
>
>
> deirdre.lee@deri.org
> skype: deirdrelee
>
> twitter: @deirdrelee
>
> linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------