- From: Laufer <laufer@globo.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:58:22 -0200
- To: DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+pXJijN1qgKNPCE+B8m6R36LydxRdrnozDF2Yn3o0E9nF_ZTg@mail.gmail.com>
But if a BP makes a reference to another one? And if we extend the document with another version? Laufer 2015-01-19 11:55 GMT-02:00 Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>: > Hi Laufer, > > The number is generated automatically :) In this case, I think it > won't be a problem to use numbers. > > thanks! > Bernadette > > 2015-01-19 10:51 GMT-03:00 Laufer <laufer@globo.com>: > > Hi all, > > > > I am reviewing the issue of suppressing the BP4 (because we have an > entire > > session about BP for data vocabularies) and if I agree in suppressing it > we > > will have no renumber all the BPs. > > > > Is the sequential numbering an ideal way of identifying the BPs? > > > > Best, > > Laufer > > > > -- > > . . . .. . . > > . . . .. > > . .. . > > > > -- > Bernadette Farias Lóscio > Centro de Informática > Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .
Received on Monday, 19 January 2015 13:58:52 UTC