Re: [dwbp] Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation (#87)

I realise I answered the wrong issue below. That was about your 
suggestions for Use standard terms to provide metadata.

So now I've messed up the threads, sorry.

Anyway, I'm afraid I don't agree with your suggestions for Provide 
Metadata either.


The current text talks about vocabularies - I know you prefer models - 
for doing things, it does not talk about encodings. Your suggested 
additions talk about how to encode the metadata. RDFa and Microdata are 
two ways of embedding DCAT, VoID, Tabular etc. so I don't think they can 
form part of the same list. Is there a vocabulary for describing APIs? I 
know one - Hydra [1], and I'd be happy to see that listed as a means of 
describing APIs, but again, the serialisation is irrelevant IMO.

Any comments from anyone else?

[1] http://www.w3.org/community/hydra/


On 22/01/2015 17:24, Phil Archer wrote:
> Moving the conversation to the WG's mailing list (please don't use
> GitHub's issue tracker - it just confuses things).
>
> -1 to this change.
>
> The original text talked about multilingualism as well as
> specialisations of vocabularies (something that has been lost). The list
> of vocabs doesn't really tell people which one to use and when.
> BP#ProvideMetadata already points to DCAT and VoID. And I think if we're
> going to cite schema.org - which I'm happy to do - then we should tell
> people when to use that rather than DCAT (a question to which I'm really
> not sure of the answer).
>
> And so on.
>
> Overall, I think we should be more specific, giving the criteria ine
> should use to make a selection and then point to a possible solution.
> So, if you want DCAT but want to include versioning then use ADMS (which
> is a DCAT profile). If your aim is specifically to target your metadata
> at search engines then use schema.org and so on.
>
> I don't think the DCAT-AP is relevant here.
>
> Phil.
>
> On 22/01/2015 16:25, Carlos Laufer wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> 2015-01-22 14:17 GMT-02:00 carlosiglesias <notifications@github.com>:
>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
>>>
>>>    https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87
>>> Commit Summary
>>>
>>>     - Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation
>>>
>>> File Changes
>>>
>>>     - *M* bp.html <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87/files#diff-0> (9)
>>>
>>> Patch Links:
>>>
>>>     - https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87.patch
>>>     - https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87.diff
>>>
>>> —
>>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
>>> <https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/pull/87>.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1

Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 18:24:06 UTC