W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > January 2015

RE: BP vocabulary section - update

From: Eric Kauz <eric.kauz@gs1.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:02:52 +0000
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F0EB2FA13CB26F47AE5F37790BBDA41619CD725F@GS1BEECH10.gs1.org>
I would agree as well that we should keep in the reference at least to reuse of vocabularies.

Best Regards


-----Original Message-----
From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl] 
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 3:26 AM
To: Public DWBP WG
Subject: Re: BP vocabulary section - update

Hi Bernadette,

Thank you for the edition!

Maybe that's because of my background, but to me the two BPs you've removed seemed natural. And I was not the one creating them ;-) At least reuse vocabularies is a no-brainer. Versioning may be harder to define but seems quite needed.

Even if we don't have the time to flesh them out, it may be interesting to leave them in. I don't remember by who, but it was said that even skeletal best practices can be useful, and I'd tend to agree (if we want to get feedback on them).

Plus, we have direct requirements for these two things, haven't we?



On 1/15/15 8:34 PM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio wrote:
> Hello Antoine and Eric,
> Thank you very much for your contribution!
> I just reviewed the Data Vocabularies section and I made some minor 
> changes. I also removed two BP (reuse vocabularies and versioning
> vocabularies) because they were too vague. I'm not sure if we still 
> have to improve these BP for this version of the document. If you have 
> time to work on this, please let me know.
> Notet that the R-VocabVersion requirement can be covered by one of the 
> Data Versioning BP.
> I agree that there is an overlap with Best Practices for Publishing 
> Linked Data [3] and this overlap should be discussed. Maybe, we should 
> discuss in the intro of the BP section because there will be overlap 
> with other BP (ex: Data Identification).
> cheers,
> Bernadette
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-bp/#VOCABULARIES

> 2015-01-14 20:47 GMT-03:00 Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>:
>> Dear all,
>> I have made a lot of edits to the section on data vocabularies in the 
>> BP document.
>> - heavily edited all paragraphs in the intro
>> - included Eric Kauz' input for a couple of best practices (thanks, 
>> Eric!) [1]
>> - added a new best practices as I had suggested in an email earlier 
>> [2] as there was no objection
>> - added an issue on the overlap between our BP and the Best Practices 
>> for Publishing Linked Data [3]. The issue is not yet in the tracker - 
>> if anyone can create it it's highly welcome!
>> I am still not 100% happy with the result. The BPs should have more 
>> flesh, there's a lot I would like to add or change in the rest, 
>> especially considering what Mark and I have done at [4]. But clearly I don't have time:
>> I have jumped in to help on this section at the last moment, this was 
>> not scheduled in my week :-( I believe however that for a first 
>> version of the BP document, it should be alright. At least we have 
>> some content and BPs for the section now, which have been 
>> contributed/reviewed by more than one person!
>> Finally, I must apologize to the editors: I have created a pull 
>> request in Github, but didn't dare to merge it. A couple of us have 
>> been editing the doc at the same time, and I don't have the time to 
>> resolve potential conflicts. For the record, my changes are only in 
>> section 7.4, and in case it's needed my own copy of the BP is updated 
>> at https://github.com/aisaac/dwbp/blob/gh-pages/bp.html

>> Best,
>> Antoine
>> [1]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0078.ht

>> ml [2]  
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0045.html

>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-bp/#VOCABULARIES

>> [4]
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Making_controlled_vocabularies_acces

>> sible_as_URI_sets
>> On 1/9/15 4:11 PM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>>> Dear Ig, Eric, Ghislain, (cc Mark in case he can jump in)
>>> It seems the call today made me a de facto coordinator for this section...
>>> The four of us are now listed as contributors 
>>> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Call_for_BP_Contributors

>>> Bernadette says that this section needs reviewing, and filling in 
>>> best practices. I just had a brief look; enough to understand she's right.
>>> My questions are:
>>> - are you ready to review this section and provide suggestions for 
>>> changes, if needed? and/or
>>> - are you ready to contribute to the best practices?
>>> This needs to happen before next Tuesday.
>>> In the meantime, a question for Ig: is the current text at 
>>> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#dataVocabularies

>>> resulting from only your work, possibly incorporating the outcome of 
>>> the discussion we had back in December?
>>> Or have others contributed, in which case we should include them in 
>>> the discussion?
>>> Thanks for the input,
>>> Antoine

CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER: The contents of this e-mail are  confidential and are not to be regarded as a contractual offer or acceptance from GS1 (registered in Belgium). 
If you are not the addressee, or if this has been copied or sent to you in error, you must not use data herein for any purpose, you must delete it, and should inform the sender. 
GS1 disclaims liability for accuracy or completeness, and opinions expressed are those of the author alone. 
GS1 may monitor communications. 
Third party rights acknowledged. 
(c) 2012.
Received on Friday, 16 January 2015 13:03:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:31 UTC