w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org from February 1997 by thread

Current Markup Language Example Len Bullard (Thursday, 27 February)

Call for participants: WWW6 workshop Jon Bosak (Wednesday, 26 February)

testing Gregory Murphy (Tuesday, 25 February)

ERB decisions on linking element recognition Tim Bray (Tuesday, 25 February)

Pardon my stupidity Tim Bray (Monday, 24 February)

Parameter entities allowed anywhere ? Norbert H. MIKULA (Monday, 24 February)

Suggested new XML slogan Tim Bray (Monday, 24 February)

Normative refs to 8879/10744? Tim Bray (Sunday, 23 February)

Re: XML FAQ v0.4 lee@sq.com (Sunday, 23 February)

XML FAQ v0.4 Peter Flynn (Sunday, 23 February)

WWW6 structured doc demo Jon Bosak (Saturday, 22 February)

New list: XML-DEV Jon Bosak (Saturday, 22 February)

Re: 3.2.a Name for generalized multilink lee@sq.com (Saturday, 22 February)

Re: 3.2 c-d Content of linking elements? lee@sq.com (Saturday, 22 February)

Re: 3.3 XML Analogue of HTML "<A"? lee@sq.com (Saturday, 22 February)

In lieu of multiple attlists: LINK? Steve Pepper (Friday, 21 February)

3.a List link required? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)

3.3 XML Analogue of HTML "<A"? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)

3.2 c-d Content of linking elements? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)

3.2.b Locators in attributes or elements? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)

3.2.a Name for generalized multilink Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)

3.1.i exclude other information? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)

3.1 b-h: Link contents question matrix Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)

3.1.a All linkage info in markup not data? Tim Bray (Friday, 21 February)

Loss of information going from SGML to XML James Clark (Friday, 21 February)

DRAFT: Summary of ERB conference call Steven J. DeRose (Thursday, 20 February)

SDATA [was: Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation] lee@sq.com (Thursday, 20 February)

SERIOUS concerns about implementation Peter Murray-Rust (Thursday, 20 February)

Re: implementation comments Peter Murray-Rust (Thursday, 20 February)

Mailing list broken? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 19 February)

6. Addressing & process model issues Tim Bray (Wednesday, 19 February)

Java-based XML browser and implementation comments Peter Murray-Rust (Wednesday, 19 February)

Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? [Accessibility] Harvey Bingham (Wednesday, 19 February)

XML FAQ: some questions Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 18 February)

re 6.2 Terry Allen (Monday, 17 February)

6. Addressing & process model issues Tim Bray (Monday, 17 February)

Re: 2.3: Link Recognition by PI or other signal? lee@sq.com (Saturday, 15 February)

Re: 2.4: Link recognition by processor fiat? lee@sq.com (Saturday, 15 February)

Re: What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? lee@sq.com (Saturday, 15 February)

ERB terminology votes Tim Bray (Sunday, 16 February)

If no new syntax, and no API, then what are we doing here . . . Henry S. Thompson (Thursday, 13 February)

2.4: Link recognition by processor fiat? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 12 February)

2.3: Link Recognition by PI or other signal? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 12 February)

2.2 a-b: Link Recognition by Reserved GI? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 12 February)

2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute? Tim Bray (Wednesday, 12 February)

ERB meeting of Feb. 12th Tim Bray (Wednesday, 12 February)

Improved, slightly modified version of my proposed redraft Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 11 February)

Winning battles but losing the war Henry S. Thompson (Wednesday, 12 February)

XML process modelling [was No Metadocuments] Terry Allen (Tuesday, 11 February)

What to do given both SYSTEM and PUBLIC? Tim Bray (Tuesday, 11 February)

The new perspective I'm pushing, continued Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 11 February)

re: get rid of leading hyphen Lou Burnard (Tuesday, 11 February)

Ontology and Epistimology for Links in XHL Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 11 February)

XML FAQ Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 11 February)

Marketing Contributions... Digitome Ltd. (Tuesday, 11 February)

XML FAQ Peter Flynn (Tuesday, 11 February)

There Are No Metadocuments Terry Allen (Monday, 10 February)

Re: "Natural XML" John_Lavagnino@Brown.edu (Sunday, 9 February)

Re "Natural XML" Terry Allen (Sunday, 9 February)

Re: XML catalog draft (Please let's not argue resolution independence again!) David Durand (Sunday, 9 February)

The Unoptimized SGML-Bundle Relations Schema for MIME Terry Allen (Sunday, 9 February)

Re: Alex's JAR documents [was: XML catalog draft] lee@sq.com (Sunday, 9 February)

Re: Get rid of the leading hyphen! lee@sq.com (Sunday, 9 February)

XML marketing contributions Jon Bosak (Sunday, 9 February)

Get rid of the leading hyphen! Jon Bosak (Sunday, 9 February)

Is XML-Link Rocket Science? Peter Murray-Rust (Saturday, 8 February)

1.4 h: Explainer? Liora Alschuler (Friday, 7 February)

List of markup declaration constraints in XML (fwd) Peter Flynn (Thursday, 6 February)

elm alternate linking proposal Eve L. Maler (Wednesday, 5 February)

Re: Section 0: Naming -- not limited to XML? lee@sq.com (Wednesday, 5 February)

Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) David G. Durand (Tuesday, 4 February)

Revised text for Section 5 of XHL Martin Bryan (Tuesday, 4 February)

Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology Harvey Bingham (Tuesday, 4 February)

Re: Section 0: Naming Tim Bray (Monday, 3 February)

[Fwd: Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue?] Len Bullard (Monday, 3 February)

NXP Update (V 0.9) released Norbert H. MIKULA (Monday, 3 February)

Re: 1.a: (David's Archform declaration gloss) David G. Durand (Monday, 3 February)

Syntax of PIs Peter Murray-Rust (Monday, 3 February)

Re: Sample Question Peter Flynn (Monday, 3 February)

Re: Subject headings -- and multiple CCs David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)

Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)

Re: 1.3, Notation: SGML? Reference Concrete? David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)

Re: 1.1.a Formatting Issues Out of Scope? David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)

Re: 1.4 e: ordinality of directionality David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)

Re: 1.4.g: define/discuss Traversal? David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)

Re: 1.4 f: terms for links colocated with their ends David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)

Re: 1.b: Excluded relationships David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)

Re: 1.4 d: Address terminology -- Another possible ambiguity. David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)

Re: 1.a: Use Elements? -- critical ambiguity in question! David G. Durand (Sunday, 2 February)

Re: text/xml volunteers needed [SHORTTAG] lee@sq.com (Sunday, 2 February)

Discussions foreground and background Jon Bosak (Saturday, 1 February)

XML and DSSSL at WWW6 Jon Bosak (Saturday, 1 February)

Current SGML ERB/WG roster Jon Bosak (Saturday, 1 February)

New members; archives updated Jon Bosak (Saturday, 1 February)

Re: text/xml volunteers needed Peter Murray-Rust (Saturday, 1 February)

Re: XML catalog draft Peter Murray-Rust (Saturday, 1 February)

Re: 1.4 d: Address terminology Martin Bryan (Saturday, 1 February)

Re: 1.4 a-c: Basic Terminology Martin Bryan (Saturday, 1 February)

Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? (repost) Martin Bryan (Saturday, 1 February)

Re: 1.c-d: Define a Link Processor and Communicate With It? Digitome Ltd. (Saturday, 1 February)

Re: 1.5: Discuss link characteristics? Digitome Ltd. (Saturday, 1 February)

Re: 1.a: Use Elements? Digitome Ltd. (Saturday, 1 February)

Re: XML catalog draft lee@sq.com (Saturday, 1 February)

Re: Production 21 (and others) lee@sq.com (Saturday, 1 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 27 February 1997 14:56:33 UTC