W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: 1.4 c: Basic Terminology

From: David G. Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 13:16:19 -0500
Message-Id: <v02130502af1d2516ab48@[205.181.197.81]>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 6:44 AM 2/4/97, Peter Flynn wrote:
>Harvey Bingham writes:
>> I hope we do plan to allow more than one terminus? [1.4 e:]
>> If so, we need a plural form.
>
>Despite my fondness for Latin, I think terminus has been anglicized
>for long enough to have acquired an -es plural. Problem is, terminuses
>sounds terrible and termini is a lot easier to say. Is there really
>no other word?

If we use termini, then we can leave it to vulgarians to get it wrong, if
they wish. I've never heard terminuses, and, like a purple cow, I never
hope to hear it.

   I think terminus is a good word...

   If it was good enough for the Romans, it's good enough for me!

  -- David

I am not a number. I am an undefined character.
_________________________________________
David Durand              dgd@cs.bu.edu  \  david@dynamicDiagrams.com
Boston University Computer Science        \  Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/   \  Dynamic Diagrams
--------------------------------------------\  http://dynamicDiagrams.com/
MAPA: mapping for the WWW                    \__________________________
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 1997 13:15:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC