- From: Peter Murray-Rust <Peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 12:27:05 GMT
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
In message <33156C8E.37D6@utila.ifi.uni-klu.ac.at> "Norbert H. MIKULA" writes: > Michael Sperberg-McQueen wrote: > > To be honest though I don't think this is a correct reading of > > production 33. There should probably be prose saying that > > PE references in the internal and external subsets are invisible > > to the grammar (in the sense that the replacement text has to > > fit where the reference goes, i.e. that you stay in the internal I took the sense of 4.3(6) to mean that PEs were treated in the same way as other entities, though I agree that strictly 4.3 does not relate to PEs. The effect is important, of course. For example, I have included HTML2.0 in my DTDs by something like: <!ENTITY % html20 SYSTEM "html20.dtd"> %html20; Unless the PEs in HTML2.0 are processed, the construct fails. [...] IMO developing parsers and real examples are the best way to discover these problems and I am very grateful to Norbert for his effort. -- Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection Virtual School of Molecular Sciences http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/
Received on Thursday, 27 February 1997 07:38:17 UTC