W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: 1.a: (David's Archform declaration gloss)

From: David G. Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 12:01:47 -0500
Message-Id: <v02130501af1bc2fe953d@[]>
To: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org>
At 9:33 AM 2/3/97, Michael Sperberg-McQueen wrote:
>   <?XHL link=a,footnote>
This indicates that the Link XHL architectural form is the only one in use
in this document, and that it applies to the element types <a> and

The DTD must declare the required attributes for that form, and the
processor _may_ validate the attribute specifications against the XHL
definition. An architectural form would specify:

    1. A set of attributes that should be present, and whether they are
optional or required (optional attributes need not be declared, as long as
not used).

    2. A content model to which every instance must corespond (and against
which the processor may validate the element's content model, for

    The processor _should_ (must?) apply appropriate link semantics to
those elements in context.

Of course, if you don't have a DTD, the attributes are still there in the

This method of doing archforms does not require #FIXED attributes to signal
an element with an archform, or indeed any architecture-signalling
attributes at all. We might prefer to continue imposing such a requirement
for compatibility with SGML practice, or we could simply allow it, on the
principle that anyone who needs the compatibility could ensure it

The other suggestion:
<?XHL all?>
would activate all XHL architectural forms for this document, and would
apply them to elements with the same names (e.g. the "link" form, if it
exists, would apply to the <link> element type). In this example, I changed
the confusing keyword "on" to "all" for greater clarity that a shole set of
declarations is actually being made.

I just realized that this should be:

<?XHL 1.0 all?>

so that when XHL 2.0 adds 500 element types, we don't create name conflicts
in existing documents.

I thought we might make "all" the default, but then we would not have an
XHL version number -- unless we make XHL and XML version numbers track

  -- David

I am not a number. I am an undefined character.
David Durand              dgd@cs.bu.edu  \  david@dynamicDiagrams.com
Boston University Computer Science        \  Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/   \  Dynamic Diagrams
--------------------------------------------\  http://dynamicDiagrams.com/
MAPA: mapping for the WWW                    \__________________________
Received on Monday, 3 February 1997 12:01:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC