- From: David G. Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
- Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 15:13:23 -0500
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
At 11:09 AM 1/31/97, Tim Bray wrote: >1.3.a Should we assume that saying links are expressed using SGML elements >and attributes, and describing them in SGML terms, is a satisfactorily >complete syntax spec, thus avoiding a requirement for any BNF? We don't need BNF, I agree, but we should use some variant of the "architecture" approach. >1.3.b If links are SGML elements, should require XML-style reference >concrete syntax + quoted attribute values? I.e. assert that >all links would fit into XML docs? YES! YES! No _more_ syntax is required, so no more should be forthcoming! -- David I am not a number. I am an undefined character. _________________________________________ David Durand dgd@cs.bu.edu \ david@dynamicDiagrams.com Boston University Computer Science \ Sr. Analyst http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/ \ Dynamic Diagrams --------------------------------------------\ http://dynamicDiagrams.com/ MAPA: mapping for the WWW \__________________________
Received on Sunday, 2 February 1997 15:13:06 UTC