W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: 2.1 a-d: Link Recognition by Reserved Attribute?

From: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 10:01:49 -0800
Message-Id: <199702131801.KAA10697@boethius.eng.sun.com>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
CC: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM
[Sean Mc Grath:]

| >At 05:53 PM 2/12/97 -0400, Murray Altheim wrote:
| >>Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> writes in separate messages:
| >>>2.1.a Should we allow link recognition via a reserved attribute?
| >>[...]
| >>>2.2.a Should we allow link recognition via a reserved GI?
| >>
| >>Is there any reason not to allow both as equivalents
| >
| >Of course not; we can approve of neither, either, or both.  I favor
| >both myself. 
| 
| Count me in for both.

I'm not following the reasoning for having both forms.  If the
reserved attribute method works, why do we need the reserved GI?  If
the reserved GI method has advantages, why use the reserved attribute?

Jon
Received on Thursday, 13 February 1997 13:01:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC