- From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 13:28:03 +0000
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 23:54 20/2/97 -0800, Tim Bray wrote: >Dimension 1: Which pieces of information should be specified for >possible inclusion in linking elements? > (Whatever happened to a in this list?) >b. Type (i) Required - must be a member of a set of XML-defined types (ii) One per link (iii) attribute name/value pair, e.g. linktype=xlink (iv) Yes (v) Yes (vi) No >c. Role (i) Optional (ii) One per locator (iii) attribute name/value pair, e.g. role=source (iv) No - but we could define a useful starter set (as per REV/REL in HTML) (v) N.A (vi) Yes >d. locator (i) Required (ii) One per locator (iii) attribute name/value pai, e.g. locator=.... (iv) N.A (v) N.A (vi) N.A >e. caption (i) Optional (ii) One per locator (iii) attribute name/value pai, e.g. purpose=.... (iv) N.A (v) N.A (vi) N.A >f. behavior (i) Optional (ii) One per link (iii) attribute name/value pai, e.g. behaviour=.... (iv) No - but we could define a (small) useful starter set (v) Yes (vi) Yes >g. locator scheme (e.g. URL, FPI, TEI locator) (i) Optional (ii) One per locator (iii) attribute name/value pai, e.g. scheme=.... (iv) No - but we should define a starter set as being TEI + whatever Internet offers (v) Yes (for MIME-types!) (vi) Not for 1.0, but we will need to later when DSSSL/SDQL becomes popular) >h. others [nominations encouraged] Up to implementations to add as required: should not be added to 1.0 definition ---- Martin Bryan, The SGML Centre, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK Phone/Fax: +44 1452 714029 WWW home page: http://www.sgml.u-net.com/
Received on Monday, 24 February 1997 08:35:36 UTC