W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: Section 0: Naming

From: Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 15:25:55 -0600
Message-ID: <32F7A963.1247@hiwaay.net>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Tim Bray wrote:
> At 03:27 PM 2/4/97 -0500, Eve L. Maler wrote:
> >I like Hyper-XML -- a lot! -- as the short name, and Hypertext Enabled XML
> >as the long name.  In fact, for the short version, HyperXML spelled solid,
> >without the hyphen, looks even better.
> HyperXML is nice.  I didn't like Sean's Hyper-X, because that collides
> with Hyper-G.

Yes.  I predcit they will quickly call it HyperX in practice, but that's
not important.

> I take it that nobody else considers it important to advertise the fact
> that this technology is *not* limited to XML applications? - Tim

Is this something like the HyTime claim that it is not limited to SGML?

Received on Tuesday, 4 February 1997 16:36:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC