W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: 1.4.g: define/discuss Traversal?

From: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 08:17:18 -0800
Message-Id: <199702041617.IAA01127@boethius.eng.sun.com>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
CC: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM
| I'm beginning to think we should leave this out.  In the spec, we
| wrote "traverse" means "use".  If we believe this, why don't we just
| say "use"?  Unless we are going to be forced to specify some
| behaviors; in which case a specific term like traversal is probably
| called for. - Tim

I'm the token minimalist on this subject, but in the case of
"traverse" I think we should take advantage of the existence of a term
that precisely describes what we mean and isn't already grossly
overloaded.

Jon
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 1997 11:17:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC