W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: Production 21 (and others)

From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
Date: 03 Feb 1997 15:09:00 +0000 (GMT)
To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
Message-id: <199702031509.PAA14323@curia.ucc.ie>
Sean McGrath writes:
[REs]
> I totally agree. Credibility amongst implementors is at stake.
> If comments are complex enough in regexp to warrant a BNF grammar 
> instead then I say lets give'em a BNF.

More than that: one FAQ from CS SGML-non-initiates (read: implementors)
is always "Where's the BNF? "Why do we have to use this weird syntax?"

///Peter
Received on Monday, 3 February 1997 11:43:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC