- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 03 Feb 1997 15:09:00 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
Sean McGrath writes: [REs] > I totally agree. Credibility amongst implementors is at stake. > If comments are complex enough in regexp to warrant a BNF grammar > instead then I say lets give'em a BNF. More than that: one FAQ from CS SGML-non-initiates (read: implementors) is always "Where's the BNF? "Why do we have to use this weird syntax?" ///Peter
Received on Monday, 3 February 1997 11:43:40 UTC