W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: 2.2 a-b: Link Recognition by Reserved GI?

From: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.UIC.EDU>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 97 17:21:21 CST
Message-Id: <199702172324.SAA11754@www10.w3.org>
To: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:53:59 -0500 Tim Bray said:
>The ERB schedule calls for voting on these Feb. 19th.
>I've take the liberty of grouping a few here that seem totally related.
>
>2.2.a Should we allow link recognition via a reserved GI?

No.  (If systems decide to assume that a GI of 'tlink' or whatever
it ends up being called in the final spec *is* a tlink in the sense
of the spec, that's error recovery in the absence of a required
declaration.  And I'm not sure it's such a great idea even as
error recovery.)

>2.2.b If so, what should the set of GI's be?

The empty set.

-CMSMcQ
Received on Monday, 17 February 1997 18:24:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC