- From: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.UIC.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 97 17:21:21 CST
- To: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:53:59 -0500 Tim Bray said: >The ERB schedule calls for voting on these Feb. 19th. >I've take the liberty of grouping a few here that seem totally related. > >2.2.a Should we allow link recognition via a reserved GI? No. (If systems decide to assume that a GI of 'tlink' or whatever it ends up being called in the final spec *is* a tlink in the sense of the spec, that's error recovery in the absence of a required declaration. And I'm not sure it's such a great idea even as error recovery.) >2.2.b If so, what should the set of GI's be? The empty set. -CMSMcQ
Received on Monday, 17 February 1997 18:24:02 UTC