- From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 22:50:35 -0600
- To: Dave Peterson <davep@acm.org>
- CC: Bill Smith <Bill.Smith@Eng.Sun.COM>, w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Dave Peterson wrote: > >My personal preference would be to include references to behavior (code) and > >appearance (style sheets). Without that separation reuse is difficult and > >object management is seriously impaired. > > Just as some would like to see SGML Link declaration information be separate > from "the document". And others insist vociferously that it *must* be > part of "the document". And others would like "the document" to be just > the SGML document element/instance. What should and should not be part of > "the document" is a religious war. :-( That is so. But just as a DSSSL processing spec can be a Java applet or Active-X object instead, religion is where we find it. It's all values. Split it up anyway you like, it's still just a tag soup of values without the DTD. len
Received on Monday, 10 February 1997 23:50:41 UTC