W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: 1.4 h: Explainer?

From: Liora Alschuler <Liora@The-Word-Electric.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 08:17:49 -0500
Message-Id: <2.2.32.19970210131749.0071b244@sover.net>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
>At 4:49 PM 2/7/97, Jon Bosak wrote:
>>I don't like "explainer" either (there seems to be a consensus
>>building on the dislike, anyway), but "caption" is too
>>presentationally specific; you wouldn't want to call this a caption if
>>it were an item in a menu list, for example.  I would suggest "label"
>>(that is, more formally, "link label").

>[David Durand]
>
>I don't like the terms description or caption in any permutations or
>variations because they imply formatting semantics.

"Description" does not speak to me of format, but neither does "link label"
which is short and sweet.

Liora



                       /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The Word Electric      \I sing the body electric 	I key the word electric\
POB 177, Route 5       /	-- Walt				-- Liora       /
E. Thetford, VT 05043  \             or, as Henry Miller said,                 \
802/785-2623	       /"Anyone can write, but writers can't do anything else."\
		       \\\\\\\\\\\\liora@the-word-electric.com\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Received on Monday, 10 February 1997 08:18:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC