- From: David G. Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
- Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 15:13:31 -0500
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
At 6:29 AM 2/1/97, Martin Bryan wrote: >NB: The last part of this will need to change when we realise that we >absolutely need to address things at a lower level than SGML containers, but >that argument seems to have been lost for this month! No, No. That's one of the things that _will_ change between draft and final draft. Throwing out span termini is a terrible idea, that makes it impossible for XML linking to deal with non-XML data. A prescription for misery, I think. We _must_ have sub-element addressing. If this was not pushed hard before the draft, it was because few people seriously advocated leaving it out, I thought. -- David I am not a number. I am an undefined character. _________________________________________ David Durand dgd@cs.bu.edu \ david@dynamicDiagrams.com Boston University Computer Science \ Sr. Analyst http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/ \ Dynamic Diagrams --------------------------------------------\ http://dynamicDiagrams.com/ MAPA: mapping for the WWW \__________________________
Received on Sunday, 2 February 1997 15:13:15 UTC