W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: SERIOUS concerns about implementation

From: Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 14:38:04 -0600
Message-ID: <330E07AC.6D89@hiwaay.net>
To: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Peter Flynn wrote:
> 
> Len writes:
> 
> > > Is it time to point to our activity statement again?
> > >
> > > http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/SGML/Activity
> >
> > Sure, but in preparing the FAQ, public announcements,
> > pleas for shareware, the gotchas should be pointed out.
> 
> Yes please...if anyone spots pet gotchas for the FAQ, I'd
> be grateful for them. v.3 should be out this weekend at

Just quickly glancing, XML isn't an "application of SGML".
I think it is a proper subset.  HTML is an application of 
SGML, and could be an application of XML.   That is, perhaps, 
one way to get the point across.

len
Received on Friday, 21 February 1997 15:49:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC