- From: David G. Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
- Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 15:13:07 -0500
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
At 11:09 AM 1/31/97, Tim Bray wrote: >1.4.f Should we define terms for links that are colocated with their > ends, and if so, should we use in-line and out-of-line? I like the terms, but if we decide to generalize things so that a pointer's address can specify that the link is one of its own termini, we may not need the distinction for the sake of the spec. It might be worth introducing these terms as names for the idioms, even if we do perform this generalization. -- David I am not a number. I am an undefined character. _________________________________________ David Durand dgd@cs.bu.edu \ david@dynamicDiagrams.com Boston University Computer Science \ Sr. Analyst http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/ \ Dynamic Diagrams --------------------------------------------\ http://dynamicDiagrams.com/ MAPA: mapping for the WWW \__________________________
Received on Sunday, 2 February 1997 15:12:51 UTC