- From: David G. Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
- Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 15:13:09 -0500
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
At 11:09 AM 1/31/97, Tim Bray wrote: >1.4.g Should we define/discuss traversal? I think the term traversal implies a specific processing model too precisely; I want to use links to write my footnotes, but have them rendered inline. Calling this traversal is consistent but confusing. Similarly for drawing a map based on a set of links (where we might not even have to fetch the documents). I think the linking markup should talk about processing, and the link processing spec needs to define a variety of kinds of traversal. -- David I am not a number. I am an undefined character. _________________________________________ David Durand dgd@cs.bu.edu \ david@dynamicDiagrams.com Boston University Computer Science \ Sr. Analyst http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/ \ Dynamic Diagrams --------------------------------------------\ http://dynamicDiagrams.com/ MAPA: mapping for the WWW \__________________________
Received on Sunday, 2 February 1997 15:12:54 UTC