W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

1.4 h: Explainer?

From: Liora Alschuler <Liora@The-Word-Electric.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 11:10:48 -0500
Message-Id: <2.2.32.19970207161048.0072e458@sover.net>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
1.4.h Does "explainer" make anyone else uncomfortable?

I added this question, at risk of bringing up something on which there is
already concensus, because I can find no reason not to call a caption a
"caption". 

This is a link caption so call it a "link caption" or if there are reasons
not to use caption, then some of the other common words already used to
describe what it does: "link title" or "link subtitle" 

"Explainer" is in the dictionary, but it sounds weird. 


                       /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The Word Electric      \I sing the body electric 	I key the word electric\
POB 177, Route 5       /	-- Walt				-- Liora       /
E. Thetford, VT 05043  \             or, as Henry Miller said,                 \
802/785-2623	       /"Anyone can write, but writers can't do anything else."\
		       \\\\\\\\\\\\liora@the-word-electric.com\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Received on Friday, 7 February 1997 11:12:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC