- From: <lee@sq.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 97 11:20:11 EST
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
> From w3.org!w3c-sgml-wg-request Wed Feb 5 06:34:43 1997 > Resent-Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 06:07:30 -0500 > Resent-Message-Id: <199702051107.GAA28556@www19.w3.org> > X-Sender: mtbryan-sgml@mail.u-net.com <Quote source="Martin Bryan"> > Pointers are what contains the address that the link uses to get to the > terminus. Without these terms you cannot completely describe the mechanism. </quote> So an XML-LINK pointer is what HTML calles a Reference, I think. E.g. HREF = Hypertext Reference. And pointers don't point to anything, but contain addresses that point to things. And the things pointed to are railway stations. OK... I think HTML has clearer terminology here, at least to me. An anchor contains (has) a reference to a resource. That resource is "a point in cyberspace" and otherwise opaque. It's also easy to understand. I'm not asking for XML to be simpler than HTML, but I *am* asking for it to be described as simply. Lee
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 1997 11:20:15 UTC