- From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
- Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 11:29:08 +0000
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
>1.c: Should we exclude relationships such as containment and >succession from this spec? No - We need concept like PARENT, CHILD, HERE and ROOT to make querying into documents that do not have any IDs or otherwised named anchor (or whatever they are called) points. > >1.d Should we specify a way for a document to provide a summary of >the linkage machinery it uses? If we can have a way of identifying the notation used for link definition, with ideally that notation pointing to the address of a Java class that can be used to implement the relevant notation, then we might be able make it possible for blind browsers to process newly invented notations. ---- Martin Bryan, The SGML Centre, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK Phone/Fax: +44 1452 714029 WWW home page: http://www.u-net.com/~sgml/
Received on Saturday, 1 February 1997 06:33:21 UTC