W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: 1.4 h: Explainer?

From: David Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 17:38:16 -0500
Message-Id: <v02130507af23e6db0ffc@[205.181.197.92]>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 4:49 PM 2/7/97, Jon Bosak wrote:
>I don't like "explainer" either (there seems to be a consensus
>building on the dislike, anyway), but "caption" is too
>presentationally specific; you wouldn't want to call this a caption if
>it were an item in a menu list, for example.  I would suggest "label"
>(that is, more formally, "link label").

I like "explainer", actually, but then I learned it in high school when
using an experimental Hypertext system at Brown -- so it's been in my
vocabulary for a long time.


I don't like the terms description or caption in any permutations or
variations because they imply formatting semantics.

  -- David

I am not a number. I am an undefined character.
_________________________________________
David Durand              dgd@cs.bu.edu  \  david@dynamicDiagrams.com
Boston University Computer Science        \  Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/   \  Dynamic Diagrams
--------------------------------------------\  http://dynamicDiagrams.com/
MAPA: mapping for the WWW                    \__________________________
Received on Sunday, 9 February 1997 17:37:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC