- From: Steve Pepper <pepper@falch.no>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 21:29:38 +0100
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 19:58 21.02.97 +0100, David (knee-jerk) Durand wrote: >At 12:43 PM +0100 2/21/97, Steve Pepper wrote: > >>Before anyone objects that the LINK feature has been jettisoned forever >>from XML, let me point out that the situation we have here is analagous to >>that of SHORTTAG and the use of the NET delimiter to enable self-identifying >>EMPTY elements: > >Yes, but it's at least _arguable_ the people agree on what SHORTTAG means, >and how it is to be interpreted. I have never felt the need to ask the question "what does LINK mean", only "what does it do?". As to interpretation: Isn't it patently obvious that the example I gave should be interpreted as meaning nothing more or less than "associate the semantics of xml-link with the xref element type"? > LINK introduces a whole new syntax, and is >widely avoided even within the SGML community (it is, of course, popular >with some SGML users). LINK just gives us a modular, extensible wrapper for the multiple attribute definition lists everyone seems to want. The syntax is dead simple, especially in the restricted form I suggested and there is free working software out there that will handle it. > No-one defended LINK before, and we already have 2 >ways to continue avoiding it, so why resurrect it now... I was late joining this list and have spent several weeks catching up. I wasn't aware that LINK had been proposed, discussed and rejected, otherwise I wouldn't have "resurrected" it. Is this the case? If so, I apologise. >We don't need any new syntax to solve the problem we have, so we should >not use any, especially something as controversial as LINK. The syntax isn't new. It dates from 1986 (earlier, actually). And I don't regard LINK as controversial. Merely little understood and much maligned. Aside from knee-jerk reactions, what are the objections? Steve -- Steve Pepper, SGML Architect, <pepper@falch.no> Falch Infotek a.s, Postboks 130 Kalbakken, N-0902 Oslo, Norway http://www.falch.no/ tel://+47 2290 2733 fax://+47 2290 2599 "Whirlwind Guide": http://www.falch.no/people/pepper/sgmltool/
Received on Friday, 21 February 1997 15:32:37 UTC