Re: 1.3, Notation: SGML? Reference Concrete?

• From: Steven J. DeRose <sjd@ebt.com>
• Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 15:39:23 -0500
• To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <2.2.32.19970210203923.00766f20@pop>

>>1.3.b If links are SGML elements, should require XML-style reference
>>concrete syntax + quoted attribute values?  I.e. assert that
>>all links would fit into XML docs?
>
>I want this to be usable with real SGML.  So I think we should *not*
>restrict them to XML-style syntax, but insert a usage note saying it
>won't work with XML unless you follow XML rules. - Tim

I think I concur on this. Though the more strongly we can encourage people
to use XML, the better.

Received on Monday, 10 February 1997 15:41:00 UTC