- From: Murray Altheim <murray@spyglass.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 18:30:28 -0400
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
lee@sq.com writes: >> I raised this in the catalog group, and >> we agreed that it was outside of our mandate and did not bother to discuss it >> further. Some of us felt that it was something that the ERB should >> add when they integrate the catalog proposal with the XML spec. > >Then I hope the ERB sends you all back to the drawing board. >What is the catalog _for_? It is for turning a PUBLIC ID into a SYSTEM ID. >That is _all_ it is for. You now have to solve the problem of finding >the CATALOG in the first place, or you have not solved the required >problem. I really have no problem at all with your accurate statement of the need for a resolution mechanism. But I must ask the question 'What is XML _for_?' in the same way you do, as we aren't trying to solve all the world's problems here, simply come up with a simplified subset of SGML called XML. There are a lot of thorny problems that XML may force to a head, but within the XML specification(s) I don't believe it appropriate to try to force resolution of this issue or of entity resolution in general. I do agree that the market will solve this (hopefully soon), as the need is obviously there. And it may be an XML application that points the way. This isn't a matter of passing the buck; it's simply outside the mandate for XML. Murray ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Murray Altheim, Program Manager Spyglass, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts email: <mailto:murray@spyglass.com> http: <http://www.cm.spyglass.com/murray/murray.html> "Give a monkey the tools and he'll eventually build a typewriter."
Received on Friday, 7 February 1997 18:25:17 UTC