- From: Terry Allen <tallen@fsc.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 14:21:33 -0800 (PST)
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
I was going to wait longer before announcing this, but as Alex has broached the subject, I have a sketch of an SGML-and-MIME spec up at http://www.wco.com/~books/draft.5feb97.txt I'm sure my use of multipart/related is off, but the point of the draft is to determine what comprises the totality of the information needed to process an SGML document. It is deliberately prolix in syntax, and the DTDs are not serious. As it is about SGML and not XML, it is probably not suitable for this list, but some might find it interesting. I would be interested in hearing off list about information types or sets I've ignored. That is, I don't particularly want to read "you could do it better this way" or "you don't need foo", at this stage. I really do want to read "you need bar, and it isn't in there." Best regards, Terry Allen Fujitsu Software Corp. tallen@fsc.fujitsu.com "In going on with these experiments, how many pretty systems do we build, which we soon find outselves obliged to destroy?" - Benjamin Franklin A Davenport Group Sponsor: http://www.ora.com/davenport/index.html
Received on Sunday, 9 February 1997 17:21:43 UTC