- From: Sam Hunting <sgmlsh@CAM.ORG>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 11:07:09 -0500 (EST)
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- cc: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
> At 09:59 PM 2/23/97 -0500, Sam Hunting wrote: > >Why not just "xlink"? The initial "x" suggests: > > ... not to mention "Extensible". Yes! The collective thought > process gives birth to another winner. Sign me up for xlink. -T. As Jon points out, it needs to begin with "XML-", being reserved. Sorry -- newbie mistake. However, for the pure sizzle, I'd think of changing the convention .... "xml-" anything doesn't exactly come trippingly off the tongue. Anyhow, if in newbie fashion I'm reopoening a can of worms,feel free to admonish me...
Received on Monday, 24 February 1997 11:07:22 UTC