W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: If no new syntax, and no API, then what are we doing here . . .

From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 08:38:39 -0600
Message-ID: <3303276F.6E5@hiwaay.net>
To: Terry Allen <tallen@fsc.fujitsu.com>
CC: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk, w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Terry Allen wrote:
> 
> Henry writes:
> >On this account the result of processing an XML document with link
> definition elements in it is TWO groves:  the document grove and a
> link grove.
> 
> The XML 1.0 spec doesn't require a parser to construct a grove,
> does it?  will that be a requirement of xmllink?

If the group could look carefully and with an unbiased view at 
the grove concepts, they could benefit from that work and 
put XML linking on much firmer foundation.  eventually you have to 
work with the output of the parser.  duh!

len bullard
Received on Thursday, 13 February 1997 09:42:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC