W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > February 1997

Re: 1.4 h: Explainer?

From: Liora Alschuler <Liora@The-Word-Electric.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 16:27:49 -0500
Message-Id: <2.2.32.19970207212749.006ff0c4@sover.net>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 06:20 PM 2/7/97 +0000, you wrote:
>At 10:29 7/2/97 -0600, Len Bullard wrote:
>
>>VRML uses Description.   Caption is better than explainer.
>
>This sounds much better
>----
>Martin Bryan, The SGML Centre, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK 
>Phone/Fax: +44 1452 714029   WWW home page: http://www.u-net.com/~sgml/

In that case, I like "link description" even better than "link caption" --
congruent with SOMETHING ELSE and real, clear English. CAption could imply a
certain position in a layout.

Liora


                       /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The Word Electric      \I sing the body electric 	I key the word electric\
POB 177, Route 5       /	-- Walt				-- Liora       /
E. Thetford, VT 05043  \             or, as Henry Miller said,                 \
802/785-2623	       /"Anyone can write, but writers can't do anything else."\
		       \\\\\\\\\\\\liora@the-word-electric.com\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Received on Friday, 7 February 1997 16:29:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:07 UTC