w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2001 by date

Sunday, 30 September 2001

Re: Literals, language, equality Brian McBride
Re: Actions/Decisions from the RDFCore Telecon 2001-09-28 Brian McBride
Re: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: Actions/Decisions from the RDFCore Telecon 2001-09-28 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: heads-up on planned changes in MT jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Saturday, 29 September 2001

Re: heads-up on planned changes in MT Dan Brickley
Re: heads-up on planned changes in MT Graham Klyne

Friday, 28 September 2001

More on literals and language Graham Klyne

Saturday, 29 September 2001

heads-up on planned changes in MT Pat Hayes

Friday, 28 September 2001

Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Pat Hayes
rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?) Aaron Swartz
Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Aaron Swartz
Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) Sergey Melnik
Literals, language, equality Graham Klyne
big issue (2001-09-28#13) Sergey Melnik
Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? Jeremy Carroll
Re: Issues list update/status? Jeremy Carroll
Working on next rev of the WDs [2001-09-28#10] Art Barstow
Actions/Decisions from the RDFCore Telecon 2001-09-28 Brian McBride
Re: PRIMER: Notes from 2001-09-27 teleconference Frank Manola
PRIMER: Notes from 2001-09-27 teleconference Eric Miller
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Brian McBride
Re: Issues list update/status? Brian McBride
WD Feedback Brian McBride
Re: Issues list update/status? Dave Beckett
Re: subject: ACTION 2001-09-21#5 subPropertyOf cycles Pat Hayes
Re: some errors in the MT jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Thursday, 27 September 2001

Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? Dan Connolly
Re: PRIMER: possible example? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? Pat Hayes
Re: PRIMER: possible example? Frank Manola
Re: MT feedback Frank Manola
Re: Issues list update/status? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
PRIMER: possible example? Pat Hayes
Re: some errors in the MT Dan Connolly
Re: MT feedback Pat Hayes
Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? Graham Klyne
Re: some errors in the MT Pat Hayes
RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? Dan Connolly
Re: some errors in the MT Pat Hayes
Re: some errors in the MT jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
Issues list update/status? Dan Connolly
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Dan Connolly
Re: PRIMER: Teleconference logistics Eric Miller
Re: subject: ACTION 2001-09-21#5 subPropertyOf cycles Frank Manola
Re: MT feedback Frank Manola
Re: subject: ACTION 2001-09-21#5 subPropertyOf cycles Graham Klyne
Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) Eric Miller
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-28 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
2001-09-21#7 Add a comment Jeremy Carroll
Re: Ampersand Test Case Description (was: 2001-09-21 Minutes) Brian McBride
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Graham Klyne
Re: some errors in the MT Graham Klyne
Re: Testing and manifest.rdf (fwd) Jan Grant
RE: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
MT feedback Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 26 September 2001

Re: some errors in the MT Dan Brickley
Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) Pat Hayes
MT problems Pat Hayes
some errors in the MT Pat Hayes
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
Re: Ampersand Test Case Description (was: 2001-09-21 Minutes) Art Barstow
PRIMER: Teleconference logistics Eric Miller
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Dave Beckett
PRIMER: regrets, comments on draft Aaron Swartz
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
call for agenda items Brian McBride
Re: Ampersand Test Case Description (was: 2001-09-21 Minutes) Pat Hayes
Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) Graham Klyne
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Pat Hayes
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Graham Klyne
Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) Martyn Horner
Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues Graham Klyne
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Graham Klyne
Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) Pat Hayes
Re: PRIMER: Arranging a telecon time Pat Hayes
Model theory done Pat Hayes
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Dan Connolly
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals by way of
Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) Frank Manola
Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) Frank Manola
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
RE: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Bill de hOra
RE: PRIMER: Arranging a telecon time Bill de hOra
Action list as of end of last telecon Brian McBride

Tuesday, 25 September 2001

Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) Dan Connolly
PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues Eric Miller
Re: PRIMER: Arranging a telecon time Frank Manola
PRIMER: Arranging a telecon time Aaron Swartz
Re: RDFS rule 0 Pat Hayes
Re: RDF Model Theory drafts Pat Hayes
RDF MT editorial stuff [was: RDFS rule 0] Dan Connolly
Re: RDFS rule 0 Pat Hayes
Re: RDFS rule 0 Pat Hayes
subject: ACTION 2001-09-21#5 subPropertyOf cycles Frank Manola
Re: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL Frank Manola
2001-09-21#11 parseType qnames Bill de hOra
Re: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL Dan Connolly
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
Re: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL Dave Beckett
RE: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL Jeremy Carroll
Re: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL Dave Beckett
Re: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL Jeremy Carroll
Re: Ampersand Test Case Description (was: 2001-09-21 Minutes) Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 24 September 2001

Ampersand Test Case Description (was: 2001-09-21 Minutes) Aaron Swartz
Re: RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Minutes Art Barstow
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Aaron Swartz
Re: RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Minutes Aaron Swartz
Re: RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Minutes Art Barstow
RE: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Graham Klyne
RE: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
Re: A proposal for entailment tests Jeremy Carroll
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Graham Klyne
Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals Graham Klyne
2001-09-07#5 Literals Jeremy Carroll
RE: RDFS rule 0 Jeremy Carroll
Re: RDFS rule 0 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: RDFS rule 0 Jeremy Carroll
RE: Model theory for primer Bill de hÓra
RDF Model Theory drafts Dave Beckett
Re: RDFS rule 0 Dan Connolly
Re: RDFS rule 0 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: A proposal for entailment tests Graham Klyne
Model theory for primer Graham Klyne

Sunday, 23 September 2001

Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) Graham Klyne

Monday, 24 September 2001

Re: RDFS rule 0 Pat Hayes

Sunday, 23 September 2001

RDFS rule 0 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: A proposal for entailment tests jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: A proposal for entailment tests Aaron Swartz
RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Minutes Aaron Swartz
Re: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragment-identifiers Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 22 September 2001

Re: A proposal for entailment tests jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: A proposal for entailment tests jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
A proposal for entailment tests jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Friday, 21 September 2001

MT diagram Pat Hayes
Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: probably regrets Eric Miller
Re: Test cases - current status ? Art Barstow
probably regrets Dan Brickley
Re: Test cases - current status ? Dave Beckett
Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) Jeremy Carroll
Re: model theory publication draft Jeremy Carroll
MT publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: model theory publication draft jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Thursday, 20 September 2001

Re: model theory publication draft jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Pat Hayes
Re: model theory publication draft Dave Beckett
Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Aaron Swartz
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Pat Hayes
Re: model theory publication draft Dan Connolly
Re: model theory publication draft jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: model theory publication draft Dave Beckett
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Aaron Swartz
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Eric Miller
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Pat Hayes
Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) Graham Klyne
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Graham Klyne
Re: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragmenmt-identifiers Graham Klyne
Test cases - current status ? Jeremy Carroll
Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
SYNTAX: Refactoring comments, schemas and status Dave Beckett
Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) Jeremy Carroll
Re: RDF IDs, N-Triples URI encoding (was Re: URI terminology demystified) Dave Beckett
Re: URI terminology demystified Pat Hayes
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Re: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragmenmt-identifiers Aaron Swartz
Re: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragmenmt-identifiers Graham Klyne
Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) Graham Klyne
Re: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragmenmt-identifiers Aaron Swartz
Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) Dan Connolly
Re: RDF IDs, N-Triples URI encoding (was Re: URI terminology demystified) Dan Connolly
RDF IDs, N-Triples URI encoding (was Re: URI terminology demystified) Dave Beckett
Re: URI terminology demystified Jeremy Carroll
URI terminology: a suggestion Dan Brickley
Re: URI terminology demystified Dan Connolly
absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragmenmt-identifiers Graham Klyne
Re: URI terminology demystified Jeremy Carroll
Re: model theory publication draft Jeremy Carroll
Re: model theory publication draft Graham Klyne
URI terminology demystified Dan Connolly
Re: what to call the nodes formerly know as Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 19 September 2001

Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: model theory publication draft jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: what to call the nodes formerly know as Frank Manola
Re: what to call the nodes formerly know as Pat Hayes
Re: model theory publication draft Graham Klyne
Re: what to call the nodes formerly know as Brian McBride
Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group Frank Manola
corrections to MT Pat Hayes
Re: what to call the nodes formerly know as Frank Manola
what to call the nodes formerly know as Pat Hayes
Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group Pat Hayes
Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group Pat Hayes
Re: model theory publication draft Graham Klyne
Re: model theory publication draft Frank Manola
Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: rdfs-no-cycles-in-subClassOf [was: Current Action List ...] Frank Manola
Re: model theory publication draft Brian McBride
Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: What is an RDF Query? Pat Hayes
rdfs-no-cycles-in-subClassOf [was: Current Action List ...] Dan Connolly
Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group Frank Manola
Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group Brian McBride
RE: What is an RDF Query? Pat Hayes
Re: PRIMER: Possible starting point? Frank Manola
RE: What is an RDF Query? Pat Hayes
Friday teleconference--partial apologies Frank Manola
RE: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values Graham Klyne
Re: model theory publication draft Brian McBride
Call for agenda items Brian McBride
Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values dehora
Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values Dan Connolly
RE: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values dehora
Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group Graham Klyne
Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 18 September 2001

Re: model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: model theory publication draft Dan Connolly
Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group Pat Hayes
Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group Dan Brickley
Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group Frank Manola
Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
model theory publication draft Pat Hayes
Re: URIs for language tags Martyn Horner
Telecon, 21-Sep-2001: regrets Graham Klyne
URIs for language tags Graham Klyne
Re: question: URIs with & character Art Barstow
SYNTAX: XML transform approach Jeremy Carroll
Re: rdfs:Literal question Graham Klyne
Re: question: URIs with & character Brian McBride
Re: Process for addressing external comments [Was:Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-09-14] Brian McBride
Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group Brian McBride
Re: Zip files of test cases Dave Beckett
Re: Zip files of test cases Brian McBride
Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range Brian McBride
Re: Zip files of test cases jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Monday, 17 September 2001

Re: rdfs:Literal question Dan Brickley
Re: rdfs:Literal question Pat Hayes
Re: rdfs:Literal question Graham Klyne
ACTION 2001-08-02#12 : EASEL's datatypes and the literal issue Jan Grant
Re: rdfs:Literal question Aaron Swartz
Re: rdfs:Literal question Pat Hayes
Re: rdfs:Literal question Aaron Swartz
rdfs:Literal question Pat Hayes
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Pat Hayes
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Brian McBride
Re: Zip files of test cases Jeremy Carroll
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Pat Hayes
Zip files of test cases Brian McBride
Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Brian McBride
RE: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group dehora
Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range Jeremy Carroll
Re: question: URIs with & character Art Barstow
Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range Brian McBride
Re: question: URIs with & character Brian McBride
Process for addressing external comments [Was:Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-09-14] Art Barstow
Re: SYNTAX: Lexical-Functional Grammar approach Jeremy Carroll
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Jeremy Carroll
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Brian McBride
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Jeremy Carroll
Re: question: URIs with & character Jeremy Carroll
Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range Art Barstow

Sunday, 16 September 2001

testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group Brian McBride

Saturday, 15 September 2001

Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem by way of

Friday, 14 September 2001

Math in email, HTML (was: SYNTAX: Lexical-Functional Grammar approach) Aaron Swartz
Re: SYNTAX: Lexical-Functional Grammar approach Graham Klyne
Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values Graham Klyne
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Graham Klyne
PRIMER: Possible starting point? Aaron Swartz
RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-09-14 Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Pat Hayes
Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values Pat Hayes
Re: SYNTAX: Lexical-Functional Grammar approach Pat Hayes
Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-14 Brian McBride
RE: Proposal: RDF Processor definition dehora
RE: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values dehora
Re: question: URIs with & character Art Barstow
Re: question: URIs with & character Brian McBride
Re: Proposal: RDF Processor definition Brian McBride
Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values Art Barstow
SYNTAX: Lexical-Functional Grammar approach Jeremy Carroll
RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL Dan Brickley
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Jeremy Carroll
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Jeremy Carroll
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Jeremy Carroll
2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values dehora
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem dehora

Thursday, 13 September 2001

Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Dan Connolly
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Aaron Swartz
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Dan Connolly
RE: Starting work on the Primer dehora
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Graham Klyne
Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Pat Hayes
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-14 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Re: Dealing with changing referents (was: Re: Working on glossary) Pat Hayes
RE: Friday's Telecon Lassila Ora (NRC/Boston)
Re: Process for handling feedback on WD's Aaron Swartz
Re: Starting work on the Primer Frank Manola
Friday's Telecon Brian McBride
Process for handling feedback on WD's Brian McBride
Re: Starting work on the Primer Martyn Horner
RE: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Jeremy Carroll
Re: Starting work on the Primer Eric Miller
2001-09-07#5 - literal problem Jeremy Carroll
Starting work on the Primer Brian McBride
Re: Dealing with changing referents (was: Re: Working on glossary) Martyn Horner
Re: Dealing with changing referents (was: Re: Working on glossary) Jeremy Carroll
Re: possible slight delay, and future regrets Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 12 September 2001

Re: Working on glossary Pat Hayes
Re: Dealing with changing referents (was: Re: Working on glossary) Dan Connolly
Dealing with changing referents (was: Re: Working on glossary) Pat Hayes
Agenda items for Friday please. Brian McBride
Regrets for the next Telecon Jan Grant
Re: Working on glossary Graham Klyne
Subclass loops; Re: possible slight delay, and future regrets Frank Manola
Re: Working on glossary Graham Klyne
Re: Working on glossary Martyn Horner
Re: Working on glossary pat hayes

Tuesday, 11 September 2001

Re: Working on glossary Graham Klyne
Re: Working on glossary pat hayes
Re: Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) Graham Klyne
A comment and question on the new syntax draft Brian McBride
Re: Working on glossary Graham Klyne
Re: some questions on RefactoringRDF draft Graham Klyne
possible slight delay, and future regrets pat hayes
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? pat hayes
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? pat hayes
Re: Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) pat hayes
Re: Working on glossary pat hayes

Monday, 10 September 2001

RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-09-07 Graham Klyne
Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 dehora
Re: RDF and applications (was: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43) Martyn Horner

Saturday, 8 September 2001

RE: RDF and applications (was: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43) Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 7 September 2001

Re: namedNode? in predicate position? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? Graham Klyne
Re: Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) Graham Klyne
Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 Art Barstow
Re: RDF and applications (was: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43) Frank Manola
RDF and applications (was: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43) Graham Klyne
Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 Graham Klyne
Re: question: URIs with & character Jeremy Carroll
[Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-07] Brian McBride
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? pat hayes
Re: Containers in RDF MT (probably off-topic) pat hayes
Re: Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) pat hayes
Re: Some general MT nit-picking pat hayes
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? pat hayes
Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) pat hayes
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers pat hayes
Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (use/mention in reification) pat hayes
Re: question: URIs with & character Brian McBride
RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft dehora
RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft Jeremy Carroll
RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft Jeremy Carroll
RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft dehora
Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 Jeremy Carroll
Re: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD Dan Brickley
Re: Agenda (Amended) for RDFCore telecon 2001-09-07 Brian McBride
Re: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD Brian McBride
double regrets and partial explanations... Dan Brickley
RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft dehora
RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft dehora
RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft dehora

Thursday, 6 September 2001

Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 Satoshi Nakamura
Re: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD Frank Manola
Re: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD Dave Beckett
Re: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD Dan Connolly
Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD Dave Beckett
Re: Agenda (Amended) for RDFCore telecon 2001-09-07 Dan Connolly
Re: Agenda (Amended) for RDFCore telecon 2001-09-07 Graham Klyne
Agenda (Amended) for RDFCore telecon 2001-09-07 Brian McBride
Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 Graham Klyne
Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 Graham Klyne
Re: Empty <rdf:RDF> [was Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 ] Frank Manola
Empty <rdf:RDF> [was Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 ] Dave Beckett
RE: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 Jeremy Carroll
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-07 Jeremy Carroll
Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 Dave Beckett
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-07 Brian McBride
Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 Jeremy Carroll
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-08-31 Dan Connolly
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-08-31 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Re: Test Case Results Jeremy Carroll
Re: Test Case Results Art Barstow
Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 Jeremy Carroll
Re: Test Case Results Jeremy Carroll
Re: Test Case Results Dave Beckett
Re: Test Case Results Jeremy Carroll
Re: Working on glossary Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 5 September 2001

weekly call for agenda items for the telecon Brian McBride
Re: Working on glossary Graham Klyne
Re: Working on glossary Martyn Horner
Some general MT nit-picking Graham Klyne
Containers in RDF MT (probably off-topic) Graham Klyne
Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) Graham Klyne
Re: Need a decision (was: Re: namedNode? in predicate position?) Aaron Swartz
Re: Need a decision (was: Re: namedNode? in predicate position?) Dan Connolly
About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 Satoshi Nakamura
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers by way of
Re: Need a decision (was: Re: namedNode? in predicate position?) Brian McBride
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? Brian McBride
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Graham Klyne
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? Graham Klyne
Re: Working on glossary Graham Klyne
Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) Brian McBride
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Brian McBride
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 4 September 2001

Re: Model Theory - minor nits pat hayes
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers pat hayes
Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (use/mention in reification) Dan Connolly
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Dan Connolly
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers pat hayes
Re: Need a decision (was: Re: namedNode? in predicate position?) Frank Manola
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers pat hayes
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers pat hayes
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers pat hayes
Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) pat hayes
Need a decision (was: Re: namedNode? in predicate position?) pat hayes
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? pat hayes
Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (use/mention in reification) pat hayes
Re: Working on glossary Aaron Swartz
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Graham Klyne
Re: Working on glossary Graham Klyne
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Graham Klyne
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Graham Klyne
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Graham Klyne
Re: cycles in subclass hierarchy (was: RDFCore Update) (fwd) Frank Manola

Friday, 31 August 2001

Re: On F2F Decisions Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 4 September 2001

Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Martyn Horner

Monday, 3 September 2001

cycles in subclass hierarchy (was: RDFCore Update) (fwd) Dan Brickley
regrets jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Model Theory - minor nits Brian McBride
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Brian McBride
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Jan Grant
Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft Brian McBride
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Dan Connolly
Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft Dan Brickley
Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft Jan Grant
Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft dehora
issues with containers - correction Brian McBride
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Jan Grant
Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Brian McBride
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? Dave Beckett
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? Dan Brickley
Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) Brian McBride
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? Art Barstow
Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft Brian McBride
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Sunday, 2 September 2001

Test Case Results Aaron Swartz
Re: namedNode? in predicate position? Aaron Swartz

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2001 15:14:01 UTC