- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:30:54 +0100
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Jos & Pat appear to agree on: > ------------------------------------------------------- >| 0c | xxx aaa yyy. | yyy rdf:type rdfs:Resource. | > ------------------------------------------------------- I don't. :-(. I had taken the position of the WG as being agnosticism as to whether Literals is-a-subset-of Resources or not. [Although looking back at a heated debate which I was not part of - it is unclear to me what the resolution was - no no no - don't restart that one]. This change appears to me to be unnecessary, particularly at this stage. The agreement of the teleconference was to publish the draft with minor editorial changes. I do not perceive this change as minor since it steps on a landmine. Hence I *OBJECT* to publication of a working draft including rule 1C from http://cvs.ilrt.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/redland/rdfcore/mt/RDFMT-currentdraft. html?rev=1.4&content-type=text/html#rdfsentail Sorry, & I really want publication to go ahead, but without 0c/1C. [I am also aware that there are complications in these area even without rule 0c. I was waiting until after publication to start discussing those complications, since in my opinion, what we agree on is very worthy of publication, and raising hornet's nest will be more productive once we have the model theory out of the door.] Jeremy
Received on Monday, 24 September 2001 09:31:07 UTC