- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 09:06:57 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 06:39:08PM +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > 1: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007.rdf > > I suggested that the triple > > <http://example.org/resource/> <http://example.org/property> "bar" . > > was missing from rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007.nt I agree. When this if fixed, the subjects of the two triples in: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0007.nt also be fixed. > 2: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0008.rdf > > There was some discussion that didn't terminate on this one. > > Dave in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0063.html > wrote: > > test 8 contains an rdf:aboutEachPrefix and is thus now not in the > > RDF/XML language. The file should be renamed as an error case or > > removed entirely (it does not test anything else that is not covered > > by other cases). > > which I am supportive of. I also support removing this test or making it an error. > A further problem is that a couple of files still have xml:base in them > as highlighted in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JulSep/0242.html I think xml:base should be removed from all of the exsiting test cases. If/when the WG decides how RDF should use/support XML Base, a new set of XML Base related test case(s) should be created.
Received on Friday, 21 September 2001 09:08:00 UTC