- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:29:56 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> (by way of "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>)
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 09:40 AM 9/26/01 -0400, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >I have agreed with Graham's suggestion of MUST-ing W3C normalization of >RDF/XML documents, but this leaves us in the strange position of having >to specify the behaviour of RDF/XML processors when they meet illegal >input as well as legal input. > >In general, I think we should only specify the semantics of legal input. I agree. Is it reasonable that the description of handling of illegal input be demoted to an implementation recommendation rather than a normative requirement? #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> ------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2001 11:00:46 UTC