Re: Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic)

At 08:08 PM 9/10/01 -0500, pat hayes wrote:
>There can be triples in IR already. The proposed V-semantics for 
>reification is just a way to be explicit about some of the triples being 
>syntactic in nature, ie in the class rdf:Statement.

Ah, got it, thanks.  On first reading, I didn't fully catch the lexical 
nature of nodes in V.  (It was all there, I just didn't read carefully enough.)

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2001 11:43:12 UTC