w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2001 by author

Aaron Swartz

• rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?) (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Friday, 28 September)
• PRIMER: regrets, comments on draft (Wednesday, 26 September)
• PRIMER: Arranging a telecon time (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Ampersand Test Case Description (was: 2001-09-21 Minutes) (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Minutes (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Sunday, 23 September)
• RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Minutes (Sunday, 23 September)
• Re: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragment-identifiers (Sunday, 23 September)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragmenmt-identifiers (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragmenmt-identifiers (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: rdfs:Literal question (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: rdfs:Literal question (Monday, 17 September)
• Math in email, HTML (was: SYNTAX: Lexical-Functional Grammar approach) (Friday, 14 September)
• PRIMER: Possible starting point? (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Process for handling feedback on WD's (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Need a decision (was: Re: namedNode? in predicate position?) (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Test Case Results (Sunday, 2 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Sunday, 2 September)

Art Barstow

• Working on next rev of the WDs [2001-09-28#10] (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: Ampersand Test Case Description (was: 2001-09-21 Minutes) (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Minutes (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 Minutes (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: Test cases - current status ? (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: question: URIs with & character (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: question: URIs with & character (Monday, 17 September)
• Process for addressing external comments [Was:Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-09-14] (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: question: URIs with & character (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Test Case Results (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Monday, 3 September)

Bill de hOra

• RE: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Wednesday, 26 September)
• RE: PRIMER: Arranging a telecon time (Wednesday, 26 September)
• 2001-09-21#11 parseType qnames (Tuesday, 25 September)

Bill de hÓra

• RE: Model theory for primer (Monday, 24 September)

Brian McBride

• Re: Literals, language, equality (Sunday, 30 September)
• Re: Actions/Decisions from the RDFCore Telecon 2001-09-28 (Sunday, 30 September)
• Actions/Decisions from the RDFCore Telecon 2001-09-28 (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: Issues list update/status? (Friday, 28 September)
• WD Feedback (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: Ampersand Test Case Description (was: 2001-09-21 Minutes) (Thursday, 27 September)
• call for agenda items (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Action list as of end of last telecon (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: what to call the nodes formerly know as (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Call for agenda items (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: question: URIs with & character (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Process for addressing external comments [Was:Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-09-14] (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Zip files of test cases (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Monday, 17 September)
• Zip files of test cases (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: question: URIs with & character (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Monday, 17 September)
• Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Sunday, 16 September)
• Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-14 (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: question: URIs with & character (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: Proposal: RDF Processor definition (Friday, 14 September)
• Friday's Telecon (Thursday, 13 September)
• Process for handling feedback on WD's (Thursday, 13 September)
• Starting work on the Primer (Thursday, 13 September)
• Agenda items for Friday please. (Wednesday, 12 September)
• A comment and question on the new syntax draft (Tuesday, 11 September)
• [Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-07] (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: question: URIs with & character (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Agenda (Amended) for RDFCore telecon 2001-09-07 (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD (Friday, 7 September)
• Agenda (Amended) for RDFCore telecon 2001-09-07 (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-07 (Thursday, 6 September)
• weekly call for agenda items for the telecon (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: Need a decision (was: Re: namedNode? in predicate position?) (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Model Theory - minor nits (Monday, 3 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Monday, 3 September)
• Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Monday, 3 September)
• issues with containers - correction (Monday, 3 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Monday, 3 September)
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (Monday, 3 September)
• Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Monday, 3 September)

bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-28 (Thursday, 27 September)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 (Thursday, 20 September)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-14 (Thursday, 13 September)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-08-31 (Thursday, 6 September)

by way of

• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Saturday, 15 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Wednesday, 5 September)

Dan Brickley

• Re: heads-up on planned changes in MT (Saturday, 29 September)
• Re: some errors in the MT (Wednesday, 26 September)
• probably regrets (Friday, 21 September)
• URI terminology: a suggestion (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: rdfs:Literal question (Monday, 17 September)
• RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD (Friday, 7 September)
• double regrets and partial explanations... (Friday, 7 September)
• cycles in subclass hierarchy (was: RDFCore Update) (fwd) (Monday, 3 September)
• Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Monday, 3 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Monday, 3 September)

Dan Connolly

• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: some errors in the MT (Thursday, 27 September)
• RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? (Thursday, 27 September)
• Issues list update/status? (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) (Tuesday, 25 September)
• RDF MT editorial stuff [was: RDFS rule 0] (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDFS rule 0 (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: RDF IDs, N-Triples URI encoding (was Re: URI terminology demystified) (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: URI terminology demystified (Thursday, 20 September)
• URI terminology demystified (Thursday, 20 September)
• rdfs-no-cycles-in-subClassOf [was: Current Action List ...] (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Dealing with changing referents (was: Re: Working on glossary) (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Agenda (Amended) for RDFCore telecon 2001-09-07 (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-08-31 (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Need a decision (was: Re: namedNode? in predicate position?) (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (use/mention in reification) (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Monday, 3 September)

Dave Beckett

• Re: Issues list update/status? (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL (Tuesday, 25 September)
• RDF Model Theory drafts (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: Test cases - current status ? (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Thursday, 20 September)
• SYNTAX: Refactoring comments, schemas and status (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: RDF IDs, N-Triples URI encoding (was Re: URI terminology demystified) (Thursday, 20 September)
• RDF IDs, N-Triples URI encoding (was Re: URI terminology demystified) (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Zip files of test cases (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD (Thursday, 6 September)
• Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD (Thursday, 6 September)
• Empty <rdf:RDF> [was Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 ] (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Test Case Results (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Monday, 3 September)

dehora

• Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values (Wednesday, 19 September)
• RE: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values (Wednesday, 19 September)
• RE: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Monday, 17 September)
• RE: Proposal: RDF Processor definition (Friday, 14 September)
• RE: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values (Friday, 14 September)
• 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Friday, 14 September)
• RE: Starting work on the Primer (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Monday, 10 September)
• RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Friday, 7 September)
• RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Friday, 7 September)
• RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Friday, 7 September)
• RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Friday, 7 September)
• RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Monday, 3 September)

Eric Miller

• PRIMER: Notes from 2001-09-27 teleconference (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: PRIMER: Teleconference logistics (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) (Thursday, 27 September)
• PRIMER: Teleconference logistics (Wednesday, 26 September)
• PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: probably regrets (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Starting work on the Primer (Thursday, 13 September)

Frank Manola

• Re: PRIMER: Notes from 2001-09-27 teleconference (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: PRIMER: possible example? (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: MT feedback (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: subject: ACTION 2001-09-21#5 subPropertyOf cycles (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: MT feedback (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: PRIMER: Arranging a telecon time (Tuesday, 25 September)
• subject: ACTION 2001-09-21#5 subPropertyOf cycles (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: what to call the nodes formerly know as (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: what to call the nodes formerly know as (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: rdfs-no-cycles-in-subClassOf [was: Current Action List ...] (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: PRIMER: Possible starting point? (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Friday teleconference--partial apologies (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Starting work on the Primer (Thursday, 13 September)
• Subclass loops; Re: possible slight delay, and future regrets (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: RDF and applications (was: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43) (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax WD (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Empty <rdf:RDF> [was Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 ] (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Need a decision (was: Re: namedNode? in predicate position?) (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: cycles in subclass hierarchy (was: RDFCore Update) (fwd) (Tuesday, 4 September)

Graham Klyne

• Re: heads-up on planned changes in MT (Saturday, 29 September)
• More on literals and language (Friday, 28 September)
• Literals, language, equality (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: subject: ACTION 2001-09-21#5 subPropertyOf cycles (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: some errors in the MT (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Wednesday, 26 September)
• RE: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Monday, 24 September)
• Model theory for primer (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) (Sunday, 23 September)
• Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragmenmt-identifiers (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragmenmt-identifiers (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) (Thursday, 20 September)
• absolute-URIs-with-optional-fragmenmt-identifiers (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 19 September)
• RE: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Telecon, 21-Sep-2001: regrets (Tuesday, 18 September)
• URIs for language tags (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: rdfs:Literal question (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: rdfs:Literal question (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: SYNTAX: Lexical-Functional Grammar approach (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: some questions on RefactoringRDF draft (Tuesday, 11 September)
• RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2001-09-07 (Monday, 10 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) (Friday, 7 September)
• RDF and applications (was: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43) (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Agenda (Amended) for RDFCore telecon 2001-09-07 (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Some general MT nit-picking (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Containers in RDF MT (probably off-topic) (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: On F2F Decisions (Friday, 31 August)

Jan Grant

• Re: Testing and manifest.rdf (fwd) (Thursday, 27 September)
• ACTION 2001-08-02#12 : EASEL's datatypes and the literal issue (Monday, 17 September)
• Regrets for the next Telecon (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Monday, 3 September)
• Re: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Monday, 3 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Monday, 3 September)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: Issues list update/status? (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Thursday, 27 September)
• 2001-09-21#7 Add a comment (Thursday, 27 September)
• RE: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Tuesday, 25 September)
• RE: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDF Schema work-in-progress, URL (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: Ampersand Test Case Description (was: 2001-09-21 Minutes) (Tuesday, 25 September)
• RE: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Monday, 24 September)
• 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Monday, 24 September)
• RE: RDFS rule 0 (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: RDFS rule 0 (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) (Friday, 21 September)
• Test cases - current status ? (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: URI terminology demystified (I18N details) (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: URI terminology demystified (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: URI terminology demystified (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Thursday, 20 September)
• SYNTAX: XML transform approach (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Zip files of test cases (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: SYNTAX: Lexical-Functional Grammar approach (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: question: URIs with & character (Monday, 17 September)
• SYNTAX: Lexical-Functional Grammar approach (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Friday, 14 September)
• RE: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Thursday, 13 September)
• 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Dealing with changing referents (was: Re: Working on glossary) (Thursday, 13 September)
• RE: RDF and applications (was: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43) (Saturday, 8 September)
• Re: question: URIs with & character (Friday, 7 September)
• RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Friday, 7 September)
• RE: quick question/request about syntax wdraft (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Friday, 7 September)
• RE: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-07 (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Test Case Results (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Test Case Results (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Test Case Results (Thursday, 6 September)

jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

• Re: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about (was: Issues list update/status?) (Sunday, 30 September)
• Re: Actions/Decisions from the RDFCore Telecon 2001-09-28 (Sunday, 30 September)
• Re: heads-up on planned changes in MT (Sunday, 30 September)
• Re: some errors in the MT (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: PRIMER: possible example? (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: Issues list update/status? (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: some errors in the MT (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: RDFS rule 0 (Monday, 24 September)
• Re: RDFS rule 0 (Monday, 24 September)
• RDFS rule 0 (Sunday, 23 September)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Sunday, 23 September)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Saturday, 22 September)
• Re: A proposal for entailment tests (Saturday, 22 September)
• A proposal for entailment tests (Saturday, 22 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Zip files of test cases (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range (Monday, 17 September)
• testcases for rdfs-domain-and-range (Sunday, 16 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Friday, 7 September)
• regrets (Monday, 3 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Monday, 3 September)

Lassila Ora (NRC/Boston)

• RE: Friday's Telecon (Thursday, 13 September)

Martyn Horner

• Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: URIs for language tags (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Starting work on the Primer (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Dealing with changing referents (was: Re: Working on glossary) (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: RDF and applications (was: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43) (Monday, 10 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Tuesday, 4 September)

Pat Hayes

• heads-up on planned changes in MT (Saturday, 29 September)
• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: subject: ACTION 2001-09-21#5 subPropertyOf cycles (Friday, 28 September)
• Re: RDF graph model limited by RDF/xml 1.0 syntax? (Thursday, 27 September)
• PRIMER: possible example? (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: MT feedback (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: some errors in the MT (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: some errors in the MT (Thursday, 27 September)
• MT feedback (Thursday, 27 September)
• Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) (Wednesday, 26 September)
• MT problems (Wednesday, 26 September)
• some errors in the MT (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Ampersand Test Case Description (was: 2001-09-21 Minutes) (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 Literals (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: PRIMER: v 0.1 of scope, outline and issues (lighten up!) (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: PRIMER: Arranging a telecon time (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Model theory done (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: RDFS rule 0 (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDF Model Theory drafts (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDFS rule 0 (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDFS rule 0 (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Re: RDFS rule 0 (Monday, 24 September)
• MT diagram (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Friday, 21 September)
• MT publication draft (Friday, 21 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-09-21 (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: URI terminology demystified (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: what to call the nodes formerly know as (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: what to call the nodes formerly know as (Wednesday, 19 September)
• corrections to MT (Wednesday, 19 September)
• what to call the nodes formerly know as (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: What is an RDF Query? (Wednesday, 19 September)
• RE: What is an RDF Query? (Wednesday, 19 September)
• RE: What is an RDF Query? (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: model theory publication draft (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: Current Action List for RDFCore Working Group (Tuesday, 18 September)
• model theory publication draft (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: rdfs:Literal question (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: rdfs:Literal question (Monday, 17 September)
• rdfs:Literal question (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Monday, 17 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#6: ns qualified parseType values (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: SYNTAX: Lexical-Functional Grammar approach (Friday, 14 September)
• Re: 2001-09-07#5 - literal problem (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Dealing with changing referents (was: Re: Working on glossary) (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: possible slight delay, and future regrets (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Dealing with changing referents (was: Re: Working on glossary) (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Tuesday, 11 September)
• possible slight delay, and future regrets (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Working on glossary (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Containers in RDF MT (probably off-topic) (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Reification in RDF MT (probably off-topic) (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Some general MT nit-picking (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (use/mention in reification) (Friday, 7 September)
• Re: Model Theory - minor nits (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Need a decision (was: Re: namedNode? in predicate position?) (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (use/mention in reification) (Tuesday, 4 September)

Satoshi Nakamura

• Re: About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Thursday, 6 September)
• About Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax Rivision 1.43 (Wednesday, 5 September)

Sergey Melnik

• Re: big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Friday, 28 September)
• big issue (2001-09-28#13) (Friday, 28 September)

Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM

• RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2001-09-14 (Friday, 14 September)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2001 15:14:01 UTC