- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:55:00 -0400
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:24:07PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > > > rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0002.rdf > > ====================================== > > > > Test has typo, last two lines of test0002.nt have subject: > > <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test02.rdf#bag> > > not the correct > > <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0002.rdf#ba > > g> > > This applies also to 0007.nt and possibly others too. All the .nt > ntriples results files need to be edited to handle the new URLs. I'll add fixing these paths and file names to my list of test case cleanup. [The .../rdfcore/... path is missing in a bunch of .nt files.] > > > rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0008.rdf > > ====================================== > > > > This is interesting. > > The URL is > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0008.rdf > > test 8 contains an rdf:aboutEachPrefix and is thus now not in the > RDF/XML language. The file should be renamed as an error case or > removed entirely (it does not test anything else that is not covered > by other cases). Based on the argument below, wouldn't rdf:aboutEachPrefix simply have no meaning and be ignored? > We have discussed 'illegal' rdf: attributes, elements before. when I > used similar words to describe what to do when such things were seen, > the WG did not agree, so they were removed. So as far as I recall we > no just considered such things as having no defined meaning. > > At present, since we do not describe what applications do with > RDF/XML (processing model), we cannot give any requirements on what > to do with unknown or undefined tokens. Since RDF systems are meant > to deal with all sorts of things, they should be used to ignoring > stuff they don't understand, which might be given a meaning by some > system built with RDF. > > Thus Satoshi's example above is not disallowed.
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2001 09:56:10 UTC